The website that exposed detailed chronicle of systematicabuse, torture and concealment of the US and other militarylogs in Iraq? ?->(Show Answer!)

1. The website that exposed detailed chronicle of systematicabuse, torture and concealment of the US and other militarylogs in Iraq?

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->For the first time in more than 40 years, Iraq has crowned a Miss Iraq beauty pageant winner. Who is that Miss Iraq?....

QA->NASA’s Deep Impact space mission was employed to take detailed pictures of which comet nucleus?....

QA->United Nations torture investigator who was barred from Zimbabwe and sent back to South Africa after a night in Harare airport?....

QA->Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) leader who has sentenced to death after he was found guilty of torture, rape and genocide during the war for independence from Pakistan in 1971?....

QA->United Nations International Day in Support of Victims of Torture....

MCQ->The website that exposed detailed chronicle of systematicabuse, torture and concealment of the US and other militarylogs in Iraq?....

MCQ->The website that exposed detailed chronicle of systematic abuse,torture and concealment of the US and other military logs in Iraq....

MCQ-> Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words have been printed in ‘’bold’’ to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.For years now, Grorge W. Bush has told Americans that he would increase the number of troops in Iraq only if the commanders on the ground asked him to do so. It was not a throwaway line: Bush said it from the very first days of the war, when he and Pentagon boss Donald Rumsfeld were criticized for going to war with too few troops. He said it right up until last summer, stressing at a news conference in Chicago that Iraq commander General George Casey ‘’Will make the decisions as to how many troops we have there.’’ Seasoned military people suspected that the line was a dodge-that the civilians who ran Pentagon were testing their personal theory that war can be fought on the cheap and the brass simply knew better than to ask for more. In any case, the president repeated the mantra to dismiss any suggestion that the war was going badly. Who, after all, knew better than the generals on the ground? Now, as the war near the end of its fourth year and the number of Americans killed has surpassed 3,000, Bush had dropped the general-know-best line. Sometime next week the President is expected to propose a surge in the number of U.S. forces in Iraq for a period of upto two years. A senior official said reinforcements numbering ‘’About 20,000 troops,’’ and may be more, could be in place within months. The ‘’surge’’ would be achieved by extending the stay of some forces already in Iraq and accelerating the deployment of others.The ‘’irony’’ is that while the generals would have liked more troops in the past, they are ‘’cool’’ idea of sending more now. That’s in part because the politicians and commanders have had trouble agreeing on what the goal of a surge would be.But it is also because they are worried that a surge would further erode the readiness of U.S.’s already stressed ground forces. And even those who back a surge are under no ‘’illusions’’ about what it would mean to the casualty rate. ‘’If you put more American troops on the front line,’’ said a White House Official, ‘’You’re going to have more casualties.’’Coming from Bush, a man known for bold strokes, the surge is a strange half-measure---too large for the political climate at home, too small to crush the ‘’insurgency’’ in Iraq and surely three years too late. Bush has waved off a bipartisan rescue mission out of pride, ‘’stubbornness" or ideology, or some combination of the three. Rather than reversing course, as well the wise elders of the Iraq Study Group advised, the Commander in Chief is betting that more troops will lead the way to what one White House official calls ‘’Victory’’.Bush and Rumsfeld had received brickbats for----
....

MCQ-> Read the following information and the accompanying graphs to answer the questions that follow. www.jay.com spent $ 5,57,000 during last 12 months for online display advertisements, also called impressions, on five websites (Website A, Website B, Website C, Website D and Website E). In this arrangement, www.jay.com is the Destination Site, and the five websites are referred to as the Ad Sites. The allocation of online display advertising expenditure is shown in Graph A. The online display advertisements helped www.jay.com to get visitors on its site. Online visitors, visiting the Ad Sites, are served display advertisements of www.jay.com and on clicking they land on the Destination Site (Graph B). Once on the Destination Site, some of the visitors complete the purchase process(Graph C)

Quality traffic = $$\frac{\text{No. of site visitors who start purchase on destination site}}{\text{No. of visitors who click the online display advertisement}}$$ Leakage in online buying = 1 − $$\frac{\text {Complete buying on the destination website}}{\text{Start buying on the destination website}}$$Efficiency of online display advertising expenditure on an Ad Site = $$\frac{\text{No. of visitors from the Ad Site who complete the purchase process}}{\text{Amount spent on the Ad Site}}$$ Which of following Ad Sites provide facility of least cost per advertisement?
....

MCQ->Which of the following is/are TRUE about the Iraq's relations with USA which is/are very much in news these days? (A) USA decides to attack on Iraq as does not want Saddam Hussein to rule Iraq. (B) USA feels that Iraq has helped terrorist groups. (C) Germany and several other countries are not supporting USA's sand on Iraq.....