In inductive reasoning,one proceeds from ?->(Show Answer!)

1. In inductive reasoning,one proceeds from

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Anil drew a bill on Binil for RS.30,000 for three months. Proceeds are to be shared equally. A got the bill discounted @12% per annum and remits the required proceeds to "B". The amount of such remittance will be........................

QA->Who introduced ‘Inductive thinking model’ ?....

QA->The impedance in an LCR circuit in which the inductive reactance is equal to the cacacitive reactance:....

QA->Photosynthesis proceeds in which sequence?....

QA->One word Substitution of " Reasoning power of the mind....

MCQ-> In the following passage, some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and select the correct answer for the given blank out of the four alternatives. People may see, and hear, and feel all their lives without ____________ learning the nature
of things they see. But reason is the mind's eye, and enables us to see why things are, and when and how events may be made to happen ___________ not to happen. The logician endeavours to ____________ exactly what this reason is which makes the power of men. We all, as I havesaid, must reason well or ill, but logic is the science of reasoning and enables us to distinguish______________ the good reasoning which leads to truth, and the bad reasoning which everyday betrays people into error _________ misfortune.their lives without ____________ learning the nature
....

MCQ->Arrange the following sentences to form a coherent paragraphA. By reasoning we mean the mental process of drawing an inference from two or more statements or going from the inference to the statements, which yield that inference.B. So logical reasoning covers those types of questions, which imply drawing an inference from the problems.C. Logic means, if we take its original meaning, the science of valid reasoning.D. Clearly, for understanding arguments and for drawing the inference correctly, it is necessary that we should understand the statements first.....

MCQ->A survey was conducted to test relative aptitudes in quantitative and logical reasoning of MBA applicants. It is perceived (prior to the survey) that 80 percent of MBA applicants are extremely good in logical reasoning, while the other 20 percent are extremely good in quantitative aptitude. Further, it is believed that those with strong quantitative knowledge are also sound in data interpretation, with conditional probability as high as 0.87. However, some MBA applicants who are extremely good in logical reasoning can be also good in data interpretation, with conditional probability 0.15. An applicant surveyed is found to be strong in data interpretation. The probability that the applicant is also strong in quantitative aptitude is....

MCQ->In inductive reasoning,one proceeds from....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the follow. Popper claimed, scientific beliefs are universal in character, and have to be so if they are to serve us in explanation and prediction. For the universality of a scientific belief implies that, no matter how many instances we have found positive, there will always be an indefinite number of unexamined instances which may or may not also be positive. We have no good reason for supposing that any of these unexamined instances will be positive, or will be negative, so we must refrain from drawing any conclusions. On the other hand, a single negative instance is sufficient to prove that the belief is false, for such an instance is logically incompatible with the universal truth of the belief. Provided, therefore, that the instance is accepted as negative we must conclude that the scientific belief is false. In short, we can sometimes deduce that a universal scientific belief is false but we can never induce that a universal scientific belief is true. It is sometimes argued that this 'asymmetry' between verification and falsification is not nearly as pronounced as Popper declared it to be. Thus, there is no inconsistency in holding that a universal scientific belief is false despite any number of positive instances; and there is no inconsistency either in holding that a universal scientific belief is true despite the evidence of a negative instance. For the belief that an instance is negative is itself a scientific belief and may be falsified by experimental evidence which we accept and which is inconsistent with it. When, for example, we draw a right-angled triangle on the surface of a sphere using parts of three great circles for its sides, and discover that for this triangle Pythagoras' Theorem does not hold, we may decide that this apparently negative instance is not really negative because it is not a genuine instance at all. Triangles drawn on the surfaces of spheres are not the sort of triangles which fall within the scope of Pythagoras' Theorem. Falsification, that is to say, is no more capable of yielding conclusive rejections of scientific belief than verification is of yielding conclusive acceptances of scientific beliefs. The asymmetry between falsification and verification, therefore, has less logical significance than Popper supposed. We should, though, resist this reasoning. Falsifications may not be conclusive, for the acceptances on which rejections are based are always provisional acceptances. But, nevertheless, it remains the case that, in falsification, if we accept falsifying claims then, to remain consistent, we must reject falsified claims. On the other hand, although verifications are also not conclusive, our acceptance or rejection of verifying instances has no implications concerning the acceptance or rejection of verified claims. Falsifying claims sometimes give us a good reason for rejecting a scientific belief, namely when the claims are accepted. But verifying claims, even when accepted, give us no good and appropriate reason for accepting any scientific belief, because any such reason would have to be inductive to be appropriate and there are no good inductive reasons.According to Popper, the statement "Scientific beliefs are universal in character" implies that....