The rule of ‘ex-post facto law’is embodied in which Article? ?->(Show Answer!)

1. The rule of ‘ex-post facto law’is embodied in which Article?

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Next Below rule is a rule is a rule intended to protect the interest of a Government servant:....

QA->The concept of corporate social responsibility is embodied in :....

QA->When the post held by an officer is upgraded, which rule will be applied for the fixation of pay in the new post?....

QA->An officer holding a substantive appointment was promoted substantively to another post. Which rule will be applied for the fixation of his pay in the new post?....

QA->A shopkeeper wants to get 20% gain on an article after allowing a discount of 15%. If the article costs him Rs.153, what price should be mark on the article?....

MCQ->The rule of ‘ex-post facto law’is embodied in which Article?....

MCQ->Consider the following statements : Assertion (A) : Ex-post facto research is systematic, empirical inquiry in which the scientist does not have direct control of independent variables, because their manifestations have already occurred or they are not manipulable. Reason (R) : In ex-post-facto research. inferences about relations among variables are made. without direct intervention. from concomitant variation of independent and dependent variables. Now select your answer according to the coding scheme given below :....

MCQ->Statement: Should all the students graduating in any discipline desirous of pursuing post-graduation of the subjects of their choice be allowed to enrol in the post-graduate courses? Arguments: Yes. The students are the best judge of their capabilities and there should not be restrictions for joining post-graduate courses. No. The students need to study relevant subjects in graduate courses to enrol in post-graduate courses and the students must fulfil such conditions. No. There are not enough institutes offering post-graduate courses which can accommodate all the graduates desirous of seeking post-graduate education of their own choice.

....

MCQ->Should all the students graduating in any discipline desirous of pursuing post graduation of the subjects of their choice be allowed to enroll in the post graduate courses ? Arguments: I. Yes, the students are best judge of their capabilities and there should not be restricted for joining post graduation courses. II. No, the students need to study relevant subjects in graduate courses to enroll in post graduate courses and the students must fulfill such conditions. III. No, there are not enough institutes offering post graduates courses which can accommodation date all the graduates desirous of seeking post graduate education of their own choice.....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow: Each piece, or part, of the whole of nature is always merely an approximation to the complete truth, or the complete truth so far as we know it. In fact, everything we know is only some kind of approximation, because we know that we do not know all the laws as yet. Therefore, things must be learned only to be unlearned again or, more likely, to be corrected. The principal of science, the definition, almost, is the following: The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific “truth.” But what is the source of knowledge? Where do the laws that are to be tested come from? Experiment, itself, helps to produce these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these hints the great generalizations – to guess at the wonderful, simple, but very strange patterns beneath them all, and then to experiment to check again whether we have made the right guess. This imagining process is so difficult that there is a division of labour in physics: there are theoretical physicists who imagine, deduce, and guess at new laws, but do not experiment; and then there are experimental physicists who experiment, imagine, deduce, and guess. We said that the laws of nature are approximate: that we first find the “wrong” ones, and then we find the “right” ones. Now, how can an experiment be “wrong”? First, in a trivial way: the apparatus can be faulty and you did not notice. But these things are easily fixed and checked back and forth. So without snatching at such minor things, how can the results of an experiment be wrong? Only by being inaccurate. For example, the mass of an object never seems to change; a spinning top has the same weight as a still one. So a “law” was invented: mass is constant, independent of speed. That “law” is now found to be incorrect. Mass is found is to increase with velocity, but appreciable increase requires velocities near that of light. A true law is: if an object moves with a speed of less than one hundred miles a second the mass is constant to within one part in a million. In some such approximate form this is a correct law. So in practice one might think that the new law makes no significant difference. Well, yes and no. For ordinary speeds we can certainly forget it and use the simple constant mass law as a good approximation. But for high speeds we are wrong, and the higher the speed, the wrong we are. Finally, and most interesting, philosophically we are completely wrong with the approximate law. Our entire picture of the world has to be altered even though the mass changes only by a little bit. This is a very peculiar thing about the philosophy, or the ideas, behind the laws. Even a very small effect sometimes requires profound changes to our ideas.Which of the following options is DEFINITLY NOT an approximation to the complete truth?
....