Millman's theorem is the best to find ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Millman's theorem is the best to find

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->The British mathematician who has been awarded the Abel Prize2016 by the Norwegian Academy of Letters and Science for his solution toFermat’s last theorem....

QA->The supersonic aircraft find its most convenient to fly in the....

QA->Find the odd that not related to Kani Mozhi:....

QA->Find the odd who was not honoured by the Leeds University for the contribution in cinema in 2007:....

QA->The supersonic air craft find it most convenient to fly in the:....

MCQ->Assertion (A): Millman's theorem helps in replacing a number of current sources in parallel by a single current source.Reason (R): Maximum power transfer theorem is applicable only for dc, circuits.

....

MCQ->Consider the following statements Tellegen's theorem is applicable to any lumped network.Reciprocity theorem is applicable to linear bilateral network.Thevenin theorem is applicable to two terminal linear active network.Norton's theorem is applicable to linear active network. Which of the above statements are correct?....

MCQ->Consider the following statements : Tellegen's theorem is applicable to any lumped networks.The reciprocity theorem is applicable to linear bilateral networks.Thevenin's theorem is applicable to two- terminal linear active networks.Norton's theorem is applicable to two-terminal linear active networks. Which of these statement are correct?....

MCQ->Millman's theorem is the best to find....

MCQ-> Read the passage carefully and answer the given questionsThe complexity of modern problems often precludes any one person from fully understanding them. Factors contributing to rising obesity levels, for example, include transportation systems and infrastructure, media, convenience foods, changing social norms, human biology and psychological factors. . . . The multidimensional or layered character of complex problems also undermines the principle of meritocracy: the idea that the ‘best person’ should be hired. There is no best person. When putting together an oncological research team, a biotech company such as Gilead or Genentech would not construct a multiple-choice test and hire the top scorers, or hire people whose resumes score highest according to some performance criteria. Instead, they would seek diversity. They would build a team of people who bring diverse knowledge bases, tools and analytic skills. . . .Believers in a meritocracy might grant that teams ought to be diverse but then argue that meritocratic principles should apply within each category. Thus the team should consist of the ‘best’ mathematicians, the ‘best’ oncologists, and the ‘best’ biostatisticians from within the pool. That position suffers from a similar flaw. Even with a knowledge domain, no test or criteria applied to individuals will produce the best team. Each of these domains possesses such depth and breadth, that no test can exist. Consider the field of neuroscience. Upwards of 50,000 papers were published last year covering various techniques, domains of enquiry and levels of analysis, ranging from molecules and synapses up through networks of neurons. Given that complexity, any attempt to rank a collection of neuroscientists from best to worst, as if they were competitors in the 50-metre butterfly, must fail. What could be true is that given a specific task and the composition of a particular team, one scientist would be more likely to contribute than another. Optimal hiring depends on context. Optimal teams will be diverse.Evidence for this claim can be seen in the way that papers and patents that combine diverse ideas tend to rank as high-impact. It can also be found in the structure of the so-called random decision forest, a state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithm. Random forests consist of ensembles of decision trees. If classifying pictures, each tree makes a vote: is that a picture of a fox or a dog? A weighted majority rules. Random forests can serve many ends. They can identify bank fraud and diseases, recommend ceiling fans and predict online dating behaviour. When building a forest, you do not select the best trees as they tend to make similar classifications. You want diversity. Programmers achieve that diversity by training each tree on different data, a technique known as bagging. They also boost the forest ‘cognitively’ by training trees on the hardest cases - those that the current forest gets wrong. This ensures even more diversity and accurate forests.Yet the fallacy of meritocracy persists. Corporations, non-profits, governments, universities and even preschools test, score and hire the ‘best’. This all but guarantees not creating the best team. Ranking people by common criteria produces homogeneity. . . . That’s not likely to lead to breakthroughs.Which of the following conditions, if true, would invalidate the passage’s main argument?
....