Assertion (A): In 8085, the zero flag is set when ALU operation results in 0. If the result is not 0, this flag is reset.Reason (R): In 8085 the S flag is set when the contents of accumulator become negative during execution of an instruction.p> ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Assertion (A): In 8085, the zero flag is set when ALU operation results in 0. If the result is not 0, this flag is reset.Reason (R): In 8085 the S flag is set when the contents of accumulator become negative during execution of an instruction.

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->What command is used to reset a MODEM when using the AT Command Set?....

QA->In November 2009, a day after a newspaper published the allegedly leaked contents of the report, the report was tabled in the Indian parliament by the Home Minister, P. Chidambaram. Name of that commission?....

QA->When execution of public work does not need much skill, what mode shall be given priority?....

QA->What minimum number of non-zero non-collinear vectors is required to produce a zero vector?....

QA->If the average of the first 6 result is 59 and that of the last six is 62, find the sixth result?....

MCQ->Assertion (A): In 8085, the zero flag is set when ALU operation results in 0. If the result is not 0, this flag is reset.Reason (R): In 8085 the S flag is set when the contents of accumulator become negative during execution of an instruction.

....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the follow. Popper claimed, scientific beliefs are universal in character, and have to be so if they are to serve us in explanation and prediction. For the universality of a scientific belief implies that, no matter how many instances we have found positive, there will always be an indefinite number of unexamined instances which may or may not also be positive. We have no good reason for supposing that any of these unexamined instances will be positive, or will be negative, so we must refrain from drawing any conclusions. On the other hand, a single negative instance is sufficient to prove that the belief is false, for such an instance is logically incompatible with the universal truth of the belief. Provided, therefore, that the instance is accepted as negative we must conclude that the scientific belief is false. In short, we can sometimes deduce that a universal scientific belief is false but we can never induce that a universal scientific belief is true. It is sometimes argued that this 'asymmetry' between verification and falsification is not nearly as pronounced as Popper declared it to be. Thus, there is no inconsistency in holding that a universal scientific belief is false despite any number of positive instances; and there is no inconsistency either in holding that a universal scientific belief is true despite the evidence of a negative instance. For the belief that an instance is negative is itself a scientific belief and may be falsified by experimental evidence which we accept and which is inconsistent with it. When, for example, we draw a right-angled triangle on the surface of a sphere using parts of three great circles for its sides, and discover that for this triangle Pythagoras' Theorem does not hold, we may decide that this apparently negative instance is not really negative because it is not a genuine instance at all. Triangles drawn on the surfaces of spheres are not the sort of triangles which fall within the scope of Pythagoras' Theorem. Falsification, that is to say, is no more capable of yielding conclusive rejections of scientific belief than verification is of yielding conclusive acceptances of scientific beliefs. The asymmetry between falsification and verification, therefore, has less logical significance than Popper supposed. We should, though, resist this reasoning. Falsifications may not be conclusive, for the acceptances on which rejections are based are always provisional acceptances. But, nevertheless, it remains the case that, in falsification, if we accept falsifying claims then, to remain consistent, we must reject falsified claims. On the other hand, although verifications are also not conclusive, our acceptance or rejection of verifying instances has no implications concerning the acceptance or rejection of verified claims. Falsifying claims sometimes give us a good reason for rejecting a scientific belief, namely when the claims are accepted. But verifying claims, even when accepted, give us no good and appropriate reason for accepting any scientific belief, because any such reason would have to be inductive to be appropriate and there are no good inductive reasons.According to Popper, the statement "Scientific beliefs are universal in character" implies that....

MCQ->Assertion (A): In 8085, P flag is for parity checking.Reason (R): If the result of ALU has even parity, P flag is set and if the result has odd parity, P flag is reset.

....

MCQ->What will be the output of the program? public class WrapTest { public static void main(String [] args) { int result = 0; short s = 42; Long x = new Long("42"); Long y = new Long(42); Short z = new Short("42"); Short x2 = new Short(s); Integer y2 = new Integer("42"); Integer z2 = new Integer(42); if (x == y) / Line 13 / result = 1; if (x.equals(y) ) / Line 15 / result = result + 10; if (x.equals(z) ) / Line 17 / result = result + 100; if (x.equals(x2) ) / Line 19 / result = result + 1000; if (x.equals(z2) ) / Line 21 / result = result + 10000; System.out.println("result = " + result); } }....

MCQ->What will be the output of the program? public class BoolTest { public static void main(String [] args) { int result = 0; Boolean b1 = new Boolean("TRUE"); Boolean b2 = new Boolean("true"); Boolean b3 = new Boolean("tRuE"); Boolean b4 = new Boolean("false"); if (b1 == b2) / Line 10 / result = 1; if (b1.equals(b2) ) / Line 12 / result = result + 10; if (b2 == b4) / Line 14 / result = result + 100; if (b2.equals(b4) ) / Line 16 / result = result + 1000; if (b2.equals(b3) ) / Line 18 / result = result + 10000; System.out.println("result = " + result); } }....