Indians became aware of the importance of the Field Medal,when one of the winners of the Medal for the year 2014 announced in Seoul was Prof.Manjul Bhargav,a person of Indian origin.The Field Medal is instituted by which of the following: ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Indians became aware of the importance of the Field Medal,when one of the winners of the Medal for the year 2014 announced in Seoul was Prof.Manjul Bhargav,a person of Indian origin.The Field Medal is instituted by which of the following:

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Prof. Amartya Sen has earned worldwide distinction in which field /area?....

QA->Who has been selected for Prof. Yeshwantrao Kelkar Youth Award (Yuva Puraskar) 2014?....

QA->Indian Athlete who won four gold medals (and one silver) in athletics in the Seoul Asiad, 1986?....

QA->Who won the Young Indians, ‘Big Achievements’ amazing Indians Awards 2016 conducted by Time Now?....

QA->Whichcity to host the fourth phase of the Vidyadhanam project piloted by Prof. K.V.Thomas Vidyadhanam Trust at St. Terasa’s College during three day visit of VicePresident Mohammad Hamid Ansari?....

MCQ->Indians became aware of the importance of the Field Medal,when one of the winners of the Medal for the year 2014 announced in Seoul was Prof.Manjul Bhargav,a person of Indian origin.The Field Medal is instituted by which of the following:....

MCQ-> Read the following paragraph and following conditions to answer the questions.The Vice Chancellor of a University wants to select a team of five member organizing committee for the next convocation of the University to be held in March 2012. The committee members are to be selected from five shortlisted professors (Prof. Ahuja, Prof. Banerjee, Prof. Chakravarty, Prof. Das and Prof. Equbal) and four short listed students (Prakash, Queen, Ravi and Sushil). Some conditions for selection of the committee members are given below: i. Prof. Ahuja and Sushil have to be together ii. Prakash cannot be put with Ravi iii. Prof. Das and Queen cannot go together iv. Prof. Chakravarty and Prof. Equbal have to be selected v. Ravi cannot be selected with Prof. Banerjee.If two members of the committee are students and Prof. Das is one of the members of the committee, who are the other committee members?
....

MCQ-> Answer the questions based on the following information. Director of an institute wants to distribute teaching assignments of HRM, Psychology, Development Studies, Trade policy and Finance to five of six newly appointed faculty members. Prof. Fotedar does not want any assignment if Prof. Das gets one of the five. Prof. Chaudhury desires either HRM or Finance or no assignment. Prof. Banik opines that if Prof. Das gets either Psychology or Trade Policy then she must get the other one. Prof. Eswar insists on an assignment if Prof. Acharya gets one.Which of the following is valid faculty - assignment combination if all the faculty preferences are considered?
....

MCQ-> Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questionsThere is an essential and irreducible ‘duality’ in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her ‘agency’, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her ‘well-being’. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self- interested motivation, in which a person’s agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person’s agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one’s agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting. To recognize the distinction between the ‘agency aspect’ and the ‘well-being aspect’ of a person does not require us to take the view that the person’s success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person’s well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation. The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility - based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well- being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.According to the ideas in the passage, the following are not true expect:
....

MCQ-> Study the following information carefully to answer the given question Ten persons from different companies viz Samsung, Bata, Microsoft, Google, Apple, HCL, ITC, Reliance, Airtel and Vodafone are sitting in two parallel rows containing five people each, in such a way that there is an equal distance between adjacent persons. In row 1- B, C, D, E and F are seated and all of them are facing south. In row-2 R, S, T, U and V are seated and all of them are facing north. Therefore, in the given seating arrangement, each member seated in a row faces another member of the other row. (All the information given above does not the order of seating as in give thefinal arrangement.) • There people sit between R and the person from Apple. The person from Reliance is an immediate neighbour of the one who faces the person from Apple. V sits to the immediate left of the one who faces the person from Reliance. • Only one person sits between V and T. The person from Bata sits second to the right of the one who faces T. F sits second to the left of the person from Google. The person from Google does not sit at an extreme end of the line. • Only two people sit between F and D. The person from Samsung faces an immediate neighbour of D. U is an immediate neighbour of the person from Microsoft. V is not from Microsoft. B sits second to the left of C. • The person from ITC is an immediate neighbour of the person from Vodafone. Neither V nor F is from ITC. The person from ITC faces the person from HCL.F is related to ITC in the same way as T is related to HCL, based on the given arrangement. To who amongst the following is D related to following the same pattern ?
....