Flange wrinkling is the defect found in the following process: ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Flange wrinkling is the defect found in the following process:

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Hackers who intrude for the sole purpose of notifying the administrator about a security defect in the system are called _____?....

QA->Which lens is used to correct long sight defect?....

QA->By using a chromatic lens in a telescope the optical defect ............can be eliminated.....

QA->The serious defect of egg in which the vitelline membrane is broken allowing the white to mix with the yolk:....

QA->What is meant by Dysmorphophobia, or body dysmorphic disorder A phobic obsession with a real or imaginary body defect ?....

MCQ->Flange wrinkling is the defect found in the following process:....

MCQ->Consider the following statements in respect of plate girders :1. A large number of cover plates are provided over flange angles so that curtailed flanges match the bending moment diagram exactly.2. At least one cover plate should extend over the entire span so that rain water may not enter and corrode the connections.3. A minimum of one-third of flange area should be provided in flange angles and balance in flange cover plates for stability.Which of the statements given above are correct ?....

MCQ->The following quantities refer to a channel section used as a beam : b = width of flange (upto centre of web thickness).h = depth of web (c/c of flange thickness). t = thickness of flange and web.I = moment of inertia of channel about xx axis.e = distance of shear centre, outside the channel from the mid thickness of the web.The value of 'e' is given by....

MCQ->Gross flange area for a riveted plate girder is to be designed considering net area as 80% of its gross area. Consider width of the flange as 500 mm while web plate as 1000 mm x 12 mm. The girder is to resist a maxi-mum BM of 4500 kNm. Maximum allowable bending stress in tension is 150 MPa. Gross flange area is....

MCQ-> Read the following discussion/passage and provide an appropriate answer for the questions that follow. Of the several features of the Toyota Production System that have been widely studied, most important is the mode of governance of the shop - floor at Toyota. Work and inter - relations between workers are highly scripted in extremely detailed ‘operating procedures’ that have to be followed rigidly, without any deviation at Toyota. Despite such rule - bound rigidity, however, Toyota does not become a ‘command - control system’. It is able to retain the character of a learning organizationIn fact, many observers characterize it as a community of scientists carrying out several small experiments simultaneously. The design of the operating procedure is the key. Every principal must find an expression in the operating procedure – that is how it has an effect in the domain of action. Workers on the shop - floor, often in teams, design the ‘operating procedure’ jointly with the supervisor through a series of hypothesis that are proposed and validated or refuted through experiments in action. The rigid and detailed ‘operating procedure’ specification throws up problems of the very minute kind; while its resolution leads to a reframing of the procedure and specifications. This inter - temporal change (or flexibility) of the specification (or operating procedure) is done at the lowest level of the organization; i.e. closest to the site of action. One implication of this arrangement is that system design can no longer be rationally optimal and standardized across the organization. It is quite common to find different work norms in contiguous assembly lines, because each might have faced a different set of problems and devised different counter - measures to tackle it. Design of the coordinating process that essentially imposes the discipline that is required in large - scale complex manufacturing systems is therefore customized to variations in man - machine context of the site of action. It evolves through numerous points of negotiation throughout the organization. It implies then that the higher levels of the hierarchy do not exercise the power of the fiat in setting work rules, for such work rules are no longer a standard set across the whole organization. It might be interesting to go through the basic Toyota philosophy that underlines its system designing practices. The notion of the ideal production system in Toyota embraces the following -‘the ability to deliver just - in - time (or on demand) a customer order in the exact specification demanded, in a batch size of one (and hence an infinite proliferation of variants, models and specifications), defect - free, without wastage of material, labour, energy or motion in a safe and (physically and emotionally) fulfilling production environment’. It did not embrace the concept of a standardized product that can be cheap by giving up variations. Preserving consumption variety was seen, in fact, as one mode of serving society. It is interesting to note that the articulation of the Toyota philosophy was made around roughly the same time that the Fordist system was establishing itself in the US automotive industry. What can be best defended as the asset which Toyota model of production leverages to give the vast range of models in a defect - free fashion?
....