Which of the following statements are correct? The conditional operator (?:) returns one of two values depending on the value of a Boolean expression. The as operator in C#.NET is used to perform conversions between compatible reference types. The &a ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Which of the following statements are correct? The conditional operator (?:) returns one of two values depending on the value of a Boolean expression. The as operator in C#.NET is used to perform conversions between compatible reference types. The & operator is also used to declare pointer types and to dereference pointers. The -> operator combines pointer dereferencing and member access. In addition to being used to specify the order of operations in an expression, brackets [ ] are used to specify casts or type conversions.

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->The Boolean expression A(B+C)+AB+AC is independent of the Boolean variable:....

QA->A byte addressable computer has memory capacity of 4096 KB and can perform 64 operations. An instruction involving 3 memory operands and one operator needs:....

QA->The method which recognize the time values of money by combining pay back with the net present value is :....

QA->…………….means the annual financial statements and other statements prescribed under Rule 65 of Kerala Panchayat Raj (Accounts) Rules, 2011?....

QA->Minimum number of AND gates required to implement the Boolean expression:ABC’ +AB’C +A’BC is....

MCQ->Which of the following statements are correct? The conditional operator (?:) returns one of two values depending on the value of a Boolean expression. The as operator in C#.NET is used to perform conversions between compatible reference types. The & operator is also used to declare pointer types and to dereference pointers. The -> operator combines pointer dereferencing and member access. In addition to being used to specify the order of operations in an expression, brackets [ ] are used to specify casts or type conversions.....

MCQ-> Venkat, a stockbroker, invested a part of his money in the stock of four companies --- A, B, C and D. Each of these companies belonged to different industries, viz., Cement, Information Technology (IT), Auto, and Steel, in no particular order. At the time of investment, the price of each stock was Rs.100. Venkat purchased only one stock of each of these companies. He was expecting returns of 20%, 10%, 30%, and 40% from the stock of companies A, B, C and D, respectively. Returns are defined as the change in the value of the stock after one year, expressed as a percentage of the initial value. During the year, two of these companies announced extraordinarily good results. One of these two companies belonged to the Cement or the IT industry, while the other one belonged to either the Steel or the Auto industry. As a result, the returns on the stocks of these two companies were higher than the initially expected returns. For the company belonging to the Cement or the IT industry with extraordinarily good results, the returns were twice that of the initially expected returns. For the company belonging to the Steel or the Auto industry, the returns on announcement of extraordinarily good results were only one and a half times that of the initially expected returns. For the remaining two companies, which did not announce extraordinarily good results, the returns realized during the year were the same as initially expected.What is the minimum average return Venkat would have earned during the year?
....

MCQ-> Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questionsThere is an essential and irreducible ‘duality’ in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her ‘agency’, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her ‘well-being’. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self- interested motivation, in which a person’s agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person’s agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one’s agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting. To recognize the distinction between the ‘agency aspect’ and the ‘well-being aspect’ of a person does not require us to take the view that the person’s success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person’s well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation. The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility - based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well- being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.According to the ideas in the passage, the following are not true expect:
....

MCQ->Which of the following statements are correct about datatypes in C#.NET? Every datatype is either a value type or a reference type. Value types are always created on the heap. Reference types are always created on the stack. Mapping of every value type to a type in Common Type System facilitates Interoperability in C#.NET. Every reference type gets mapped to a type in Common Type System.....

MCQ->Which of the following statements are correct about the Bitwise & operator used in C#.NET? The & operator can be used to Invert a bit. The & operator can be used to put ON a bit. The & operator can be used to put OFF a bit. The & operator can be used to check whether a bit is ON. The & operator can be used to check whether a bit is OFF.....