The pressure variations inside the inner ear are turned into electrical signals by the: ?->(Show Answer!)

1. The pressure variations inside the inner ear are turned into electrical signals by the:

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Salim walked 100 meters facing towards south. From there he turned left and walked 40 meters. Thereafter, he turned to his left, walked 100m meters and stopped. How far and in what direction is Salim now from his starting point?....

QA->Which is an instrument used for examining the outer ear and ear drum is ?....

QA->The electronic record for recording of electric variations that occur during contraction of muscles of heart is?....

QA->Water vapour is turned into water droplets by which process?....

QA->Which was a revolutionary who later turned into a yogi and a philosopher?....

MCQ->The pressure variations inside the inner ear are turned into electrical signals by the:....

MCQ-> A game of strategy, as currently conceived in game theory, is a situation in which two or more “players” make choices among available alternatives (moves). The totality of choices determines the outcomes of the game, and it is assumed that the rank order of preferences for the outcomes is different for different players. Thus the “interests” of the players are generally in conflict. Whether these interests are diametrically opposed or only partially opposed depends on the type of game.Psychologically, most interesting situations arise when the interests of the players are partly coincident and partly opposed, because then one can postulate not only a conflict among the players but also inner conflicts within the players. Each is torn between a tendency to cooperate, so as to promote the common interests, and a tendency to compete, so as to enhance his own individual interests.Internal conflicts are always psychologically interesting. What we vaguely call “interesting” psychology is in very great measure the psychology of inner conflict. Inner conflict is also held to be an important component of serious literature as distinguished from less serious genres. The classical tragedy, as well as the serious novel, reveals the inner conflict of central figures. The superficial adventure story, on the other hand, depicts only external conflict; that is, the threats to the person with whom the reader (or viewer) identifies stem in these stories exclusively from external obstacles and from the adversaries who create them. On the most primitive level this sort of external conflict is psychologically empty. In the fisticuffs between the protagonists of good and evil, no psychological problems are involved or, at any rate, none are depicted in juvenile representations of conflict.The detective story, the “adult” analogue of a juvenile adventure tale, has at times been described as a glorification of intellectualized conflict. However, a great deal of the interest in the plots of these stories is sustained by withholding the unraveling of a solution to a problem. The effort of solving the problem is in itself not a conflict if the adversary (the unknown criminal) remains passive, like Nature, whose secrets the scientist supposedly unravels by deduction. If the adversary actively puts obstacles in the detective’s path toward the solution, there is genuine conflict. But the conflict is psychologically interesting only to the extent that it contains irrational components such as a tactical error on the criminal’s part or the detective’s insight into some psychological quirk of the criminal or something of this sort. Conflict conducted in a perfectly rational manner is psychologically no more interesting than a standard Western. For example, Tic-tac-toe, played perfectly by both players, is completely devoid of psychological interest. Chess may be psychologically interesting but only to the extent that it is played not quite rationally. Played completely rationally, chess would not be different from Tic-tac-toe.In short, a pure conflict of interest (what is called a zero-sum game) although it offers a wealth of interesting conceptual problems, is not interesting psychologically, except to the extent that its conduct departs from rational norms.According to the passage, internal conflicts are psychologically more interesting than external conflicts because
....

MCQ->Kiran walked 78 meters towards North.From there he turned left and walked 35 meters.Thereafter he turned to his left,walked 30 meters,turned right and walked 5 meters again.Next,he turned left and walked 48 meters and stoppeHow far and in which direction is Kiran now from his starting point?....

MCQ->Kiran walked 78 meters towards North. From there he turned left and walked 35 meters. Thereafter, he turned to his left, walked 30 meters; turned right and walked 5 meters again. Next, he turned left and walked 48 meters and stopped. How far and in which direction is Kiran now from his starting point ?....

MCQ->Mr. A travelled from a point ‘X’ straight towards east at a distance 80 m. He turned to his right and walked 40 m. He again turned to his right and again walked 80 m. He then turned his left and walked 20 m and took left and again walked 80m. Now he turned towards his left and walked 60 m and stopped. How far and in which direction is he from the starting point ‘X’ ?....