Identify the best argument for Raja to decide in favor of the IRA. ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Identify the best argument for Raja to decide in favor of the IRA.

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Who is authorised to decide over a dispute regarding disqualification of a member of Parliament?....

QA->What is a strong argument for the particle nature of cathode rays?....

QA->Raja Raja Chola invaded Kerala in:....

QA->Who gave Raja Ram Mohan Roy the title "Raja""?....

QA->Identify the ignerous rocks ?....

MCQ->Identify the best argument for Raja to decide in favor of the IRA.....

MCQ-> Read the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Thakur Raja, a young cabinet minister, glanced through the notes of his secretary regarding the recent controversies on ‘Racket’, the most popular game of the country. While International Racket Association (IRA) has agreed to implement Drug Testing Code (DTC), the Racket Club which controls the entire Racket related activities had some reservations regarding the initiative. A majority of the citizens eagerly awaited their country's participation and performance at the international competitions during the Champions Trophy. Due to the popularity of the game, 70% of the total revenue associated with the game originates from the country. Hence, the Racket Club has earned high bargaining power with the IRA and can influence decisions not aligned with its interests. Three of the most popular and senior players of the Club, including the captain, are against the imposition of DTC citing security reasons. A decision against the interests of these players might result in law and order problems throughout the country. Other players support the decision of their senior colleagues and if the Racket Club refuses, players may support the rebel Counter Racket Club, a new national level initiative. The Counter Racket Club can challenge the monopoly of the Racket Club, if it succeeds in attracting some popular players.Raja was a great soccer player and has major reservations against racket. According to him, racket has negative influence on the country’s youth and distracts them from productive work. He also considers drug testing as an essential feature of any sports and games across the world. As the new cabinet minister for Youth and Sports, he needs to take some important decisions on this contentious issue.If Thakur Raja wants to create a lasting impact, the most reasonable option for him is to:
....

MCQ-> Read the passage carefully and answer the given questionsThe complexity of modern problems often precludes any one person from fully understanding them. Factors contributing to rising obesity levels, for example, include transportation systems and infrastructure, media, convenience foods, changing social norms, human biology and psychological factors. . . . The multidimensional or layered character of complex problems also undermines the principle of meritocracy: the idea that the ‘best person’ should be hired. There is no best person. When putting together an oncological research team, a biotech company such as Gilead or Genentech would not construct a multiple-choice test and hire the top scorers, or hire people whose resumes score highest according to some performance criteria. Instead, they would seek diversity. They would build a team of people who bring diverse knowledge bases, tools and analytic skills. . . .Believers in a meritocracy might grant that teams ought to be diverse but then argue that meritocratic principles should apply within each category. Thus the team should consist of the ‘best’ mathematicians, the ‘best’ oncologists, and the ‘best’ biostatisticians from within the pool. That position suffers from a similar flaw. Even with a knowledge domain, no test or criteria applied to individuals will produce the best team. Each of these domains possesses such depth and breadth, that no test can exist. Consider the field of neuroscience. Upwards of 50,000 papers were published last year covering various techniques, domains of enquiry and levels of analysis, ranging from molecules and synapses up through networks of neurons. Given that complexity, any attempt to rank a collection of neuroscientists from best to worst, as if they were competitors in the 50-metre butterfly, must fail. What could be true is that given a specific task and the composition of a particular team, one scientist would be more likely to contribute than another. Optimal hiring depends on context. Optimal teams will be diverse.Evidence for this claim can be seen in the way that papers and patents that combine diverse ideas tend to rank as high-impact. It can also be found in the structure of the so-called random decision forest, a state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithm. Random forests consist of ensembles of decision trees. If classifying pictures, each tree makes a vote: is that a picture of a fox or a dog? A weighted majority rules. Random forests can serve many ends. They can identify bank fraud and diseases, recommend ceiling fans and predict online dating behaviour. When building a forest, you do not select the best trees as they tend to make similar classifications. You want diversity. Programmers achieve that diversity by training each tree on different data, a technique known as bagging. They also boost the forest ‘cognitively’ by training trees on the hardest cases - those that the current forest gets wrong. This ensures even more diversity and accurate forests.Yet the fallacy of meritocracy persists. Corporations, non-profits, governments, universities and even preschools test, score and hire the ‘best’. This all but guarantees not creating the best team. Ranking people by common criteria produces homogeneity. . . . That’s not likely to lead to breakthroughs.Which of the following conditions, if true, would invalidate the passage’s main argument?
....

MCQ-> In a making decisions about important questions it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘strong’ arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question ‘Weak’ argument are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered (A), (B) and (C).You have to decide which of the argument is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘Weak’ argument.Statement:Should there be a cap on drawing ground water for irrigation purpose in India ? Arguments:(A) No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country. (B)Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater which may lead to serious environmental consequences (C)Yes India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it....

MCQ-> In making decisions about important questions it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments ‘Strong’ arguments so far they relate to the question ‘strong’ arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question ‘weak’ arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered as I and II You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument. Give answer a:if only argument I is strong Give answer b:if only argument II is strong Give answer c:if either I or II strong Give answer d:if neither I nor II is strong Give answer e:if both I and II are strong.Statement:Should the habit of late coming in educational institutions be checked ? Arguments: I.No Unit it affects the work II.Yes Discipline must be maintained.....