Statements: All papers are woods. Some woods are leaves. All leaves are trunks. Conclusions : I. All trunks being woods is a possibility. II. Some trunks are papers. ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Statements: All papers are woods. Some woods are leaves. All leaves are trunks. Conclusions : I. All trunks being woods is a possibility. II. Some trunks are papers.

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->In a club 70% members read English news papers and 75% members read Malayalam news papers, while 20% do not read both papers. If 325 members read both the news papers, then the total numbers in the club is .........?....

QA->…………….means the annual financial statements and other statements prescribed under Rule 65 of Kerala Panchayat Raj (Accounts) Rules, 2011?....

QA->In India, the issue of commercial papers came into being after the recommendations of :....

QA->Statements of affairs method is called or known as _____ method.....

QA->Consider a Program Graph (PG) with statements as nodes and control as edges. Which of the following is not true for any PG?....

MCQ->Statements: All papers are woods. Some woods are leaves. All leaves are trunks. Conclusions : I. All trunks being woods is a possibility. II. Some trunks are papers.....

MCQ-> In each of the following questions, two/three statements followed by two Conclusions numbered I and II are given. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given Conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer a: if neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II follows Give answer b: if either Conclusion I or Conclusion II follows Give answer c: if both the Conclusion I and Conclusion II follow Give answer d: if only Conclusion I follows Give answer e: if only Conclusion II followsStatements: All papers are woods. Some woods are leaves. All leaves are trunks.Conclusions : I. Some leaves are papers. II. Atleast some trunks are woods.....

MCQ-> Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questionsThere is an essential and irreducible ‘duality’ in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her ‘agency’, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her ‘well-being’. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self- interested motivation, in which a person’s agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person’s agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one’s agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting. To recognize the distinction between the ‘agency aspect’ and the ‘well-being aspect’ of a person does not require us to take the view that the person’s success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person’s well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation. The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility - based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well- being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.According to the ideas in the passage, the following are not true expect:
....

MCQ->On her walk through the park, Hamsa collected 50 coloured leaves, all either maple or oak. She sorted them by category when she got home, and found the following:The number of red oak leaves with spots is even and positive.The number of red oak leaves without any spot equals the number of red maple leaves without spots.All non-red oak leaves have spots, and there are five times as many of them as there are red spotted oak leaves.There are no spotted maple leaves that are not red.There are exactly 6 red spotted maple leaves.There are exactly 22 maple leaves that are neither spotted nor red.How many oak leaves did she collect?....

MCQ->Statements : All desks are chairs. All chairs are tables. All tables are boxes. All boxes are trunks. Conclusions : I. Some trunks are tables. II. All chairs are boxes. III. Some boxes are desks. IV. All desks are trunks.....