In the following number series, a wrong number is given. Find out that wrong number.7 9 16 25 41 68 107 173<br/> ?->(Show Answer!)

1. In the following number series, a wrong number is given. Find out that wrong number.7 9 16 25 41 68 107 173

Write Comment

Comments

By: anil on 05 May 2019 01.27 am

The pattern here followed is : 7 + 9 = 16 9 + 16 = 25 16 + 25 = 41 25 + 41 = 66 41 + 66 = 107 66 + 107 = 173 Thus, 68 is wrong

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Idiom of 173. To come to grief....

QA->Find the missing number in the series 68,81,96,……….132....

QA->Morse test is conducted to find out the indicated power of :....

QA->Manufacturing Account is prepared to find out....................

QA->A legal enquiry to find out faults.....

MCQ-> DI
rectI
ons: I
n the followI
ng passage there are blanks, each of whI
ch has been numbered. These numbers are prI
nted below the passage and agaI
nst each, fI
ve words/ phrases are suggested, one of whI
ch fI
ts the blank approprI
ately. FI
nd out the approprI
ate word/ phrase I
n each case.There I
s a consI
derable amount of research about the factors that make a company I
nnovate. So I
s I
t possI
ble to create an envI
ronment (I
) to I
nnovatI
on? ThI
s I
s a partI
cularly pertI
nent (I
I
) for I
ndI
a today. MassI
ve problems I
n health, educatI
on etc (I
I
I
) be solved usI
ng a conventI
onal Approach but (I
V) creatI
ve and I
nnovatI
ve solutI
ons that can ensure radI
cal change and (V). There are several factors I
n I
ndI
a's (VI
). Few countrI
es have the rI
ch dI
versI
ty that I
ndI
a or I
ts large, young populatI
on (VI
I
). WhI
le these (VI
I
I
) I
nnovatI
on polI
cy I
nterventI
ons certaI
n addI
tI
onal steps are also requI
red. These I
nclude (I
X) I
nvestment I
n research and development by (X) the government and the prI
vate sector, easy transfer of technology from the academI
c world etc. To fulfI
ll I
ts promI
se of beI
ng prosperous and to be at the forefront, I
ndI
a must be I
nnovatI
ve.I
....

MCQ-> In the following number series, a wrong number is given. Find out that wrong number.7 9 16 25 41 68 107 173
....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow: Each piece, or part, of the whole of nature is always merely an approximation to the complete truth, or the complete truth so far as we know it. In fact, everything we know is only some kind of approximation, because we know that we do not know all the laws as yet. Therefore, things must be learned only to be unlearned again or, more likely, to be corrected. The principal of science, the definition, almost, is the following: The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific “truth.” But what is the source of knowledge? Where do the laws that are to be tested come from? Experiment, itself, helps to produce these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these hints the great generalizations – to guess at the wonderful, simple, but very strange patterns beneath them all, and then to experiment to check again whether we have made the right guess. This imagining process is so difficult that there is a division of labour in physics: there are theoretical physicists who imagine, deduce, and guess at new laws, but do not experiment; and then there are experimental physicists who experiment, imagine, deduce, and guess. We said that the laws of nature are approximate: that we first find the “wrong” ones, and then we find the “right” ones. Now, how can an experiment be “wrong”? First, in a trivial way: the apparatus can be faulty and you did not notice. But these things are easily fixed and checked back and forth. So without snatching at such minor things, how can the results of an experiment be wrong? Only by being inaccurate. For example, the mass of an object never seems to change; a spinning top has the same weight as a still one. So a “law” was invented: mass is constant, independent of speed. That “law” is now found to be incorrect. Mass is found is to increase with velocity, but appreciable increase requires velocities near that of light. A true law is: if an object moves with a speed of less than one hundred miles a second the mass is constant to within one part in a million. In some such approximate form this is a correct law. So in practice one might think that the new law makes no significant difference. Well, yes and no. For ordinary speeds we can certainly forget it and use the simple constant mass law as a good approximation. But for high speeds we are wrong, and the higher the speed, the wrong we are. Finally, and most interesting, philosophically we are completely wrong with the approximate law. Our entire picture of the world has to be altered even though the mass changes only by a little bit. This is a very peculiar thing about the philosophy, or the ideas, behind the laws. Even a very small effect sometimes requires profound changes to our ideas.Which of the following options is DEFINITLY NOT an approximation to the complete truth?
....

MCQ-> In the following number series, a wrong number is given. Find out that wrong number.16 19 21 30 46 71 107
....

MCQ-> In the following passage there are blanks each of which has been numbered These numbers are printed below the passage and against each five words are suggested one of which fits the blank appropriately Find out the appropriate Find out the appropriate word in each case In an upper class drawing room in Mumbai a dozen or so (166
) the city's was a live-wire party an hour ago Poets editors writers filmmakers all card carrying members of the rich and powerful not at this late hour on their ninth drink are (168)in what Indians are best known to do media bashing armchair criticism and name-calling Inevitably the talk turns to Tehelka and its managing director and editor in chief Tarun Tejpal and the party quickly degenerates into an orgy of guilt and shame and that peculiar habit of the Indian intelligentsia passing the buck with everyone present attacking his neighbour for not supporting Tejpal more It is a trait Tejpal is (169)with and has been telling me about in the weeks preceding this interview Often at parties when someone (170) me great job carry on what you are doing and showers with me staggering praise staggering love staggering (171) just smile and let it pass as i don’t want about to score a brownie point and say and what about you boss what will you do ? This lightly tossed sentence with the slightest hint of a dark chuckle is the only time I have seen Tejpal allow for bitterness though I have been (172)him for weeks for signs of it Because for man who has been the victim of the most (173) government witch-hunts in recent years Tejpal is astonishingly devoid of (174) you expect him to rage to spew fire to heap scorn and anger at his enemies and instead what you encounter is a man in whose eyes you see only compassion and a weary understanding of the nature of the beast The abiding irony in all this is that unlike his armchair supporters in the middle class who rave and rant on his behalf but do nothing else Tejpal displays forbearance The fact that i am essentially a literary animal and literature has helped i’m not a black and white person I;m a (175) who understands the greys he says to me at a coffee shop over tea.166
....