40 S yarn cone package fixed in the warpe's creel has a yarn mass of 1.5 kg. If the warper's beam are produced for a warp length of 7800 m, calculate number of doffs for which the cone will supply the yarn. ?->(Show Answer!)

1. 40 S yarn cone package fixed in the warpe's creel has a yarn mass of 1.5 kg. If the warper's beam are produced for a warp length of 7800 m, calculate number of doffs for which the cone will supply the yarn.

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->The ratio of the inertial mass to gravitational mass is equal to which number?....

QA->Which nuclides having the same number of neutrons but different number of protons or mass number?....

QA->What is the number of electrons in an atom of atomic number Z and mass number A?....

QA->Who did the first scientific attempt to calculate the national income of India in 1931-32?....

QA->Who was the first to calculate the diameter of the Moon ?....

MCQ->40 S yarn cone package fixed in the warpe's creel has a yarn mass of 1.5 kg. If the warper's beam are produced for a warp length of 7800 m, calculate number of doffs for which the cone will supply the yarn.....

MCQ->Curved surface area of Cone P is seven times the curved surface area of Cone Q. Slant height of Cone Q is seven times the slant height of Cone P. What will be the ratio of the area of the base of Cone P to the area of the base of Cone Q?....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow: Each piece, or part, of the whole of nature is always merely an approximation to the complete truth, or the complete truth so far as we know it. In fact, everything we know is only some kind of approximation, because we know that we do not know all the laws as yet. Therefore, things must be learned only to be unlearned again or, more likely, to be corrected. The principal of science, the definition, almost, is the following: The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific “truth.” But what is the source of knowledge? Where do the laws that are to be tested come from? Experiment, itself, helps to produce these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these hints the great generalizations – to guess at the wonderful, simple, but very strange patterns beneath them all, and then to experiment to check again whether we have made the right guess. This imagining process is so difficult that there is a division of labour in physics: there are theoretical physicists who imagine, deduce, and guess at new laws, but do not experiment; and then there are experimental physicists who experiment, imagine, deduce, and guess. We said that the laws of nature are approximate: that we first find the “wrong” ones, and then we find the “right” ones. Now, how can an experiment be “wrong”? First, in a trivial way: the apparatus can be faulty and you did not notice. But these things are easily fixed and checked back and forth. So without snatching at such minor things, how can the results of an experiment be wrong? Only by being inaccurate. For example, the mass of an object never seems to change; a spinning top has the same weight as a still one. So a “law” was invented: mass is constant, independent of speed. That “law” is now found to be incorrect. Mass is found is to increase with velocity, but appreciable increase requires velocities near that of light. A true law is: if an object moves with a speed of less than one hundred miles a second the mass is constant to within one part in a million. In some such approximate form this is a correct law. So in practice one might think that the new law makes no significant difference. Well, yes and no. For ordinary speeds we can certainly forget it and use the simple constant mass law as a good approximation. But for high speeds we are wrong, and the higher the speed, the wrong we are. Finally, and most interesting, philosophically we are completely wrong with the approximate law. Our entire picture of the world has to be altered even though the mass changes only by a little bit. This is a very peculiar thing about the philosophy, or the ideas, behind the laws. Even a very small effect sometimes requires profound changes to our ideas.Which of the following options is DEFINITLY NOT an approximation to the complete truth?
....

MCQ-> Answer the questions based on the following information.Ghosh Babu has a manufacturing unit. The following graph gives the cost for the various number of units. Given: Profit = Revenue – Variable cost – Fixed cost. The fixed cost remains constant up to 34 units after which additional investment is to be done in fixed assets. In any case, production cannot exceed 50 units.

Note: The fixed cost for less than 34 units is 50 and the the fixed cost for more is 100. The revenu from 50 units is 1000 and the variable cost from 50 units is 700What is the minimum number of units that need to be produced to make sure that there was no loss?
....

MCQ->A horizontal fixed beam is fixed at both it ends A and B. During loading, the right support sinks by an amount δ. Flexural rigidity of the beam is uniform and is equal to EI. Length of the beam is L. What is the moment developed at the centre of the beam due to sinking of the support ?....