Statistical test of a non-directional hypothesis is ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Statistical test of a non-directional hypothesis is

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->The steering geometry that aids directional stability is :....

QA->Who discovered Avogadro’s Hypothesis ?....

QA->Who is the inventor of Avogradra’s Hypothesis?....

QA->Syngular or Plural of word Hypothesis....

QA->Inventor of Avogradra’s Hypothesis....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for questions that follow. Certain variants of key behavioural genes, “risk allele” make people more vulnerable to certain mood, psychiatric, or personality disorders. An allele is any of the variants of a gene that takes more than one form. A risk allele, then, is simply a gene variant that increases your likelihood of developing a problem. Researchers have identified a dozen - odd gene variants that can increase a person’s susceptibility to depression, anxiety and antisocial, sociopathic, or violent behaviours, and other problems - if, and only if, the person carrying the variant suffers a traumatic or stressful childhood or faces particularly trying experiences later in life. This hypothesis, often called the “stress diathesis” or “genetic vulnerability” model, has come to saturate psychiatry and behavioural science. Recently, however, an alternate hypothesis has emerged from this one and is turning it inside out. This new model suggests that it’s a mistake to understand these “risk” genes only as liabilities. According to this new thinking, these “bad genes” can create dysfunctions in unfavourable contexts - but they can also enhance function in favourable contexts. The genetic sensitivities to negative experience that the vulnerability hypothesis has identified, it follows, are just the downside of a bigger phenomenon: a heightened genetic sensitivity to all experience. This hypothesis has been anticipated by Swedish folk wisdom which has long spoken of “dandelion” children. These dandelion children - equivalent to our “normal” or “healthy” children, with “resilient” genes - do pretty well almost anywhere, whether raised in the equivalent of a sidewalk crack or well - tended garden. There are also “orchid” children, who will wilt if ignored or maltreated but bloom spectacularly with greenhouse care. According to this orchid hypothesis, risk becomes possibility; vulnerability becomes plasticity and responsiveness. Gene variants generally considered misfortunes can instead now be understood as highly leveraged evolutionary bets, with both high risks and high potential rewards. In this view, having both dandelion and orchid kids greatly raises a family’s (and a species’) chance of succeeding, over time and in any given environment. The behavioural diversity provided by these two different types of temperament also supplies precisely what a smart, strong species needs if it is to spread across and dominate a changing world. The many dandelions in a population provide an underlying stability. The less - numerous orchids, meanwhile, may falter in some environments but can excel in those that suit them. And even when they lead troubled early lives, some of the resulting heightened responses to adversity that can be problematic in everyday life - increased novelty - seeking, restlessness of attention, elevated risk - taking, or aggression - can prove advantageous in certain challenging situations: wars, social strife of many kinds, and migrations to new environments. Together, the steady dandelions and the mercurial orchids offer an adaptive flexibility that neither can provide alone. Together, they open a path to otherwise unreachable individual and collective achievements.The passage suggests ‘orchids’:
....

MCQ->"Children will score high on a reading achievement test after 1st grade than they did prior to 1st grade". The above need a one-tailed test The above is directional hypothesis The above is a null hypothesis The above need a two-tailed test....

MCQ->Statistical test of a non-directional hypothesis is....

MCQ->Which two of the following are legal declarations for nonnested classes and interfaces? final abstract class Test {} public static interface Test {} final public class Test {} protected abstract class Test {} protected interface Test {} abstract public class Test {}....

MCQ->What will be the output of the program? public class Test { public int aMethod() { static int i = 0; i++; return i; } public static void main(String args[]) { Test test = new Test(); test.aMethod(); int j = test.aMethod(); System.out.println(j); } }....