Which was the first member of Lok Sabha to be expelled under the Anti defection law in 1998? ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Which was the first member of Lok Sabha to be expelled under the Anti defection law in 1998?

Answer: Laluhoma

Reply

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Which was the first member of Lok Sabha to be expelled under the Anti defection law in 1998?....

QA->Rebel Kerala Congress (M) leader who was disqualified as member of the Kerala state Assembly by Speaker N. Shakthan under anti-defection law on a petition by the party?....

QA->Which constituency is represented by Lok Sabha SpeakerSumitra Mahajan in 16th Lok Sabha?....

QA->Which schedule of the Constitution deals with the Anti-defection provisions?....

QA->Which Constitutional Amendemend is related to anti defection provision?....

MCQ->It is known that China’s GDP in 1998 was 7% higher than its value in 1997, while India’s GDP drew by 2% during the same period. The GDP of South Korea, on the other hand, fell by 5%.Which of the following statements is/are true?[list=1][*]Foreign equity inflows to China were higher in 1998 than in 1997.[*]Foreign equity inflows to China were lower in 1998 than in 1997.[*]Foreign equity inflows to India were higher in 1998 than in 1997.[*]Foreign equity inflows to South Korea decreased in 1998 relative to 1997.[*]Foreign equity inflows to South Korea increased in 1998 relative to 1997,[/list]...

MCQ->Consider the following statements:Attorney General of India can 1. take part in the proceedings of the Lok Sabha 2. be a member of a committee of the Lok Sabha 3. speak in the Lok Sabha 4. vote in the Lok Sabha Which of the statements given above is/are correct?...

MCQ->Consider the following statements: Attorney General of India can 1. take part in the proceedings of the Lok Sabha 2. be a member of a committee of the Lok Sabha 3. speak in the Lok Sabha 4. vote in the Lok Sabha Which of the statements given above is/are correct?...

MCQ->Identify the leader who uttered the following statement : "I am not anti-English, I am not anti-British, I am not anti-any government,but I am anti-untruth, anti-humbug and anti-injustice... so long as the goverment speels injustice,it may regards me as its enemy, implacable enemy..."...

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow: Each piece, or part, of the whole of nature is always merely an approximation to the complete truth, or the complete truth so far as we know it. In fact, everything we know is only some kind of approximation, because we know that we do not know all the laws as yet. Therefore, things must be learned only to be unlearned again or, more likely, to be corrected. The principal of science, the definition, almost, is the following: The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific “truth.” But what is the source of knowledge? Where do the laws that are to be tested come from? Experiment, itself, helps to produce these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these hints the great generalizations – to guess at the wonderful, simple, but very strange patterns beneath them all, and then to experiment to check again whether we have made the right guess. This imagining process is so difficult that there is a division of labour in physics: there are theoretical physicists who imagine, deduce, and guess at new laws, but do not experiment; and then there are experimental physicists who experiment, imagine, deduce, and guess. We said that the laws of nature are approximate: that we first find the “wrong” ones, and then we find the “right” ones. Now, how can an experiment be “wrong”? First, in a trivial way: the apparatus can be faulty and you did not notice. But these things are easily fixed and checked back and forth. So without snatching at such minor things, how can the results of an experiment be wrong? Only by being inaccurate. For example, the mass of an object never seems to change; a spinning top has the same weight as a still one. So a “law” was invented: mass is constant, independent of speed. That “law” is now found to be incorrect. Mass is found is to increase with velocity, but appreciable increase requires velocities near that of light. A true law is: if an object moves with a speed of less than one hundred miles a second the mass is constant to within one part in a million. In some such approximate form this is a correct law. So in practice one might think that the new law makes no significant difference. Well, yes and no. For ordinary speeds we can certainly forget it and use the simple constant mass law as a good approximation. But for high speeds we are wrong, and the higher the speed, the wrong we are. Finally, and most interesting, philosophically we are completely wrong with the approximate law. Our entire picture of the world has to be altered even though the mass changes only by a little bit. This is a very peculiar thing about the philosophy, or the ideas, behind the laws. Even a very small effect sometimes requires profound changes to our ideas.Which of the following options is DEFINITLY NOT an approximation to the complete truth?
...