1. Question: Manoj, Prabhakar, Akash and Kamal are four friends. Who among them is the heaviest ? Statements: Prabhakar is heavier than Manoj and Kamal but lighter than Akash. Manoj is lighter than Prabhakar and Akash but heavier than Kamal.






Write Comment

Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)

Comments

Tags
Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->…………….means the annual financial statements and other statements prescribed under Rule 65 of Kerala Panchayat Raj (Accounts) Rules, 2011?....
QA->The heavier silicates named ‘Sima’ or silica + magnesium are most abundant in which layer?....
QA->Manoj Mishra has been appointed Chairman and Managing Director of which Union Government owned company?....
QA->A women buys ten dozen of oranges for Rs.120 and sells them at four for Rs.5,what is her profit?....
QA->Which programme was started by the Govt. of India with the objective of providing economic security to the rural women & to encourage the saving habit among them?....
MCQ->Question: Manoj, Prabhakar, Akash and Kamal are four friends. Who among them is the heaviest ? Statements: Prabhakar is heavier than Manoj and Kamal but lighter than Akash. Manoj is lighter than Prabhakar and Akash but heavier than Kamal.

....
MCQ->Among six friends M,N,O,P,Q and R, who is the second heaviest? O is heavier than only two friends. P is heavier than Q but lighter than N. R is the heaviest. M is lighter than only two friends. N is heavier than O but lighter than R. P is heavier than only Q.....
MCQ-> Social life is an outflow and meeting of personality, which means that its end is the meeting of character, temperament, and sensibility, in which our thoughts and feelings, and sense perceptions are brought into play at their lightest and yet keenest.This aspect, to my thinking, is realized as much in large parties composed of casual acquaintances or even strangers, as in intimate meetings of old friends. I am not one of those superior persons who hold cocktail parties in contempt, looking upon them as barren or at best as very tryingly kaleidoscopic places for gathering, because of the strangers one has to meet in them; which is no argument, for even our most intimate friends must at one time have been strangers to us. These large gatherings will be only what we make of them if not anything better, they can be as good places to collect new friends from as the slavemarkets of Istanbul were for beautiful slaves or New Market for race horses.But they do offer more immediate enjoyment. For one thing, in them one can see the external expression of social life in appearance and behaviour at its widest and most varied where one can admire beauty of body or air, hear voices remarkable either for sweetness of refinement, look on elegance of clothes or deportment. What is more, these parties are schools for training in sociability, for in them we have to treat strangers as friends. So, in them we see social sympathy in widest commonalty spread, or at least should. We show an atrophy of the natural human instinct of getting pleasure and happiness out of other human beings if we cannot treat strangers as friends for the moment. And I would go further and paraphrase Pater to say that not to be able to discriminate every moment some passionate attitude in those about us, even when we meet them casually, is on this short day of frost and sun which out life is, to sleep before evening.So, it will be seen that my conception of social life is modest, for it makes no demands on what we have, though it does make some on what we are. Interest, wonder, sympathy, and love, the first two leading to the last two, are the psychological prerequisites for social life; and the need for the first two must not be underrated. We cannot make the most even of our intimate social life unless we are able to make strangers of our oldest friends everyday by discovering unknown areas in their personality, and transform them into new friends. In sum, social life is a function of vitality.It is tragic, however, to observe that it is these very natural springs of social life which are drying up among us. It is becoming more and more difficult to come across fellow-feeling for human beings as such in our society and in all its strata. In the poor middle class, in the course of all my life. I have hardly seen any social life properly so-called. Not only has the grinding routine of making a living killed all desire for it in them, it has also generated a standing mood of peevish hostility to other human beings. Increasing economic distress in recent years has infinitely worsened this state of affairs, and has also brought a sinister addition class hatred. This has become the greatest collective emotional enjoyment of the poor middle class, and indeed they feel most social when they form a pack, and snarl or howl at people who are better off than they.Their most innocent exhibition of sociability is seen when they spill out from their intolerable homes into the streets and bazaars. I was astonished to see the milling crowds in the poor suburbs of Calcutta. But even there a group of flippant young loafers would put on a conspiratorial look if they saw a man in good clothes passing by them either on foot or in a car. I had borrowed a car from a relative to visit a friend in one of these suburbs, and he became very anxious when I had not returned before dusk. Acid and bombs, he said, were thrown at card almost every evening in that area. I was amazed. But I also know as a fact that my brother was blackmailed to pay five rupees on a trumped up charge when passing in a car through one such locality.The situation is differently inhuman, but not a whit more human, among the well-to-do. Kindliness for fellow human beings has been smothered in them, taken as a class, by the arrogance of worldly position, which among the Bengalis who show this snobbery is often only a third-class position.The word ‘they’ in the first sentence of the third paragraph refers to
 ....
MCQ->Who amongst the six friends M, N, 0, P, Q and R - is the heaviest? I. O is heavier than only two friends. P is heavier than Q. P is lighter than N. II. M is lighter than only two friends. N is heavier than O. N is lighter than R. P is heavier than Q.....
MCQ-> Each of the questions below consists of a question and two statements numbered I and II given below it. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Give answer a: if the data in statement I alone are sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement II alone are not sufficient to answer the question. Give answer b: if the data in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement I alone are not sufficient to answer the question. Give answer c: if the data either in statement I alone or in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question. Give answer d: if the data given in both the statements I & II together are not sufficient to answer the question, and Give answer e: if the data in both the statements I & II together are necessary to answer the question.Among M, P, K, J, T and W, who is lighter than only the heaviest ? I. P is heavier than M and T. II. W is heavier than P but lighter than J who is not the heaviest.....
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use
DMCA.com Protection Status Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions