Assertion (A): If Z1(s) and Z2(s) are positive real then Z1(s) + Z2(s) as well as 1/Z1(s) and 1/Z2(s) are positive real.Reason (R): The poles of a positive real function are real or occur in conjugate pairs.p> ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Assertion (A): If Z1(s) and Z2(s) are positive real then Z1(s) + Z2(s) as well as 1/Z1(s) and 1/Z2(s) are positive real.Reason (R): The poles of a positive real function are real or occur in conjugate pairs.

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Poles are arranged in straight line with 1 metre gap between them. How many poles will be there in a straight line of 30 metres ?....

QA->A cyclist goes 40 km towards East and then turning to right he goes 40 km. Again he turn to his left and goes 20 km. After this he turns to his left and goes 40 km, then again turns right and goes 10km. How far is he from his starting point?....

QA->Jose travels 7 km to the north.Then again he turns to the right and walks 3 km.Then again he turns to his right and moves 7 km forward.How many kilometers away is he from the starting point?....

QA->A shoe was thrown at a Hurriyat leader in October 21, 2010 at a function where Kashmiri separatists as well as Naxal and Khalistan sympathisers came together under one platform to air their grievances. Name of that leader who is the Chairman of All Parties Hurriyat (freedom) Conference (G)?....

QA->The Karakoram Highway connects which pairs of countries?....

MCQ-> Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questionsThere is an essential and irreducible ‘duality’ in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her ‘agency’, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her ‘well-being’. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self- interested motivation, in which a person’s agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person’s agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one’s agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting. To recognize the distinction between the ‘agency aspect’ and the ‘well-being aspect’ of a person does not require us to take the view that the person’s success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person’s well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation. The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility - based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well- being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.According to the ideas in the passage, the following are not true expect:
....

MCQ->Assertion (A): If Z1(s) and Z2(s) are positive real then Z1(s) + Z2(s) as well as 1/Z1(s) and 1/Z2(s) are positive real.Reason (R): The poles of a positive real function are real or occur in conjugate pairs.

....

MCQ->Assertion (A): The part of root locus on the real axis is not dependent on the poles and zeros which are not on the real axis.Reason (R): Poles and zeros which are not on the real axis occur in conjugate pairs

....

MCQ->Assertion (A): The root locus of a control system is symmetrical about real axis.Reason (R): For all polynomials with real coefficients, complex poles always occur in conjugate pairs.

....

MCQ->Assertion (A): In root locus the breakaway and break in points either lie on real axis or occur in complex conjugate pairs.Reason (R): All root locus asymptotes intersect on real axis.

....