A roundabout is provided with an average entry width of 8.4 m, width of weaving section as 14 m, and length of the weaving section between channelizing islands as 35 m. The crossing traffic and total traffic on the weaving section are 1000 and 2000 P ?->(Show Answer!)

1. A roundabout is provided with an average entry width of 8.4 m, width of weaving section as 14 m, and length of the weaving section between channelizing islands as 35 m. The crossing traffic and total traffic on the weaving section are 1000 and 2000 PCU per hour respectively. The nearest rounded capacity of the roundabout (in PCU per hour) is

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->If a car covers 60 km at 30 km per hour and the next 120 km at 60 km per hour,what is the average speed of the car over the entire distance of 180 km?....

QA->General Crossing is deals as per section ______ of the N1 act.....

QA->The ratio of the width to the length of our national flag is:....

QA->WHAT IS THE RATIO OF WIDTH OF INDIAN NATIONAL FLAG TO ITS LENGTH....

QA->A school has only three classes comprised of 40, 50 and 60 students respectively. In these classes, 10%, 20% and 10% students respectively passed in the examinations. What is the percentage of students passed in the examination from the entire school?....

MCQ->A roundabout is provided with an average entry width of 8.4 m, width of weaving section as 14 m, and length of the weaving section between channelizing islands as 35 m. The crossing traffic and total traffic on the weaving section are 1000 and 2000 PCU per hour respectively. The nearest rounded capacity of the roundabout (in PCU per hour) is....

MCQ->Consider the following parameters related to a rotary intersection :1. Width of the weaving section.2. Length of the weaving section.3. Proportion of weaving traffic.4. Weaving angle.5. Width of the carriageway at entry.Capacity is generally expressed in terms of....

MCQ-> Directions for the following four questions: Each question is followed by two statements A and B. Indicate your responses based on data sufficiencyThe average weight of a class of 100 students is 45 kg. The class consists of two sections, I and II, each with 50 students. The average weight, $$W_I$$ , of Section I is smaller than the average weight, $$W_{II}$$ , of Section II. If the heaviest student, say Deepak, of Section II is moved to Section I, and the lightest student, say Poonam, of Section I is moved to Section II, then the average weights of the two sections are switched, i.e., the average weight of Section I becomes $$W_{II}$$ and that of Section II becomes $$W_I$$ . What is the weight of Poonam?A: $$W_{II} - W_I = 1.0 $$B: Moving Deepak from Section II to I (without any move from I to II) makes the average weights of the two sections equal.
....

MCQ-> Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below : Following are the criteria for short listing candidates for calling for interview for Management Trainees in an organization : The candidates must- (i) not be less than 21 years and more than 28 years as on 1.11.04. (ii) have secured at least 60 per cent marks in graduation. (iii) have secured at least 65 per cent marks in the preliminary selection examination. (iv) have secured at least 55 per cent marks in the final selection examination. (v) be ready to join work immediately after the interview. In the case of a candidate who fulfills all other criteria EXCEPT- (A) at (iv) above but has secured more than 75 per cent marks in preliminary selection examination his/her case is to be referred to Deputy General Manager. (B) at (ii) above but has secured at least 65 per cent marks in post graduation, his/her case is to be referred to General Manager. In each of the questions below is given the information of one candidate. You have to study the information provided with reference to the conditions given above and decide whether the candidate is to be called for interview or some other course of action as stated below is to be taken. You are not to assume other than the information provided in each question. All these cases are given to you as on 1.11.2004. Now read the information provided in each question and decide which of the following courses of actions is to be taken with regard to each candidate and mark your answer.Mark answer a: if the candidate is to be called for interview. Mark answer b: if the case is to be referred to General Manager. Mark answer c: if the candidate is not to be called for interview. Mark answer d: if the data provided are not sufficient to take a decision. Mark answer e: if the case is to be referred to Deputy General Manager.Neelam Srivastava has secured 75 per cent marks in the preliminary selection examination. She was 22 years old as on 5th December, 2000. She has secured 65 per cent and 60 per cent marks in the Final selection examination and in graduation respectively. She is ready to join immediately after the interview.
....

MCQ-> The passage given below is followed by a set of three questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The difficulties historians face in establishing cause-and-effect relations in the history of human societies are broadly similar to the difficulties facing astronomers, climatologists, ecologists, evolutionary biologists, geologists, and palaeontologists. To varying degrees each of these fields is plagued by the impossibility of performing replicated, controlled experimental interventions, the complexity arising from enormous numbers of variables, the resulting uniqueness of each system, the consequent impossibility of formulating universal laws, and the difficulties of predicting emergent properties and future behaviour. Prediction in history, as in other historical sciences, is most feasible on large spatial scales and over long times, when the unique features of millions of small-scale brief events become averaged out. Just as I could predict the sex ratio of the next 1,000 newborns but not the sexes of my own two children, the historian can recognize factors that made2 1 inevitable the broad outcome of the collision between American and Eurasian societies after 13,000 years of separate developments, but not the outcome of the 1960 U.S. presidential election. The details of which candidate said what during a single televised debate in October 1960 Could have given the electoral victory to Nixon instead of to Kennedy, but no details of who said what could have blocked the European conquest of Native Americans. How can students of human history profit from the experience of scientists in other historical sciences? A methodology that has proved useful involves the comparative method and so-called natural experiments. While neither astronomers studying galaxy formation nor human historians can manipulate their systems in controlled laboratory experiments, they both can take advantage of natural experiments, by comparing systems differing in the presence or absence (or in the strong or weak effect) of some putative causative factor. For example, epidemiologists, forbidden to feed large amounts of salt to people experimentally, have still been able to identify effects of high salt intake by comparing groups of humans who already differ greatly in their salt intake; and cultural anthropologists, unable to provide human groups experimentally with varying resource abundances for many centuries, still study long-term effects of resource abundance on human societies by comparing recent Polynesian populations living on islands differing naturally in resource abundance.The student of human history can draw on many more natural experiments than just comparisons among the five inhabited continents. Comparisons can also utilize large islands that have developed complex societies in a considerable degree of isolation (such as Japan, Madagascar, Native American Hispaniola, New Guinea, Hawaii, and many others), as well as societies on hundreds of smaller islands and regional societies within each of the continents. Natural experiments in any field, whether in ecology or human history, are inherently open to potential methodological criticisms. Those include confounding effects of natural variation in additional variables besides the one of interest, as well as problems in inferring chains of causation from observed correlations between variables. Such methodological problems have been discussed in great detail for some of the historical sciences. In particular, epidemiology, the science of drawing inferences about human diseases by comparing groups of people (often by retrospective historical studies), has for a long time successfully employed formalized procedures for dealing with problems similar to those facing historians of human societies. In short, I acknowledge that it is much more difficult to understand human history than to understand problems in fields of science where history is unimportant and where fewer individual variables operate. Nevertheless, successful methodologies for analyzing historical problems have been worked out in several fields. As a result, the histories of dinosaurs, nebulae, and glaciers are generally acknowledged to belong to fields of science rather than to the humanities.Why do islands with considerable degree of isolation provide valuable insights into human history?
....