Which of the statements given below are correct? A) Julio Granda won the 2017 World Senior Chess Championship. B) Tan Zhongyi won the 2017 World Junior Chess Championship. C) Russia hosted the Golf 2017 Players Championship. ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Which of the statements given below are correct? A) Julio Granda won the 2017 World Senior Chess Championship. B) Tan Zhongyi won the 2017 World Junior Chess Championship. C) Russia hosted the Golf 2017 Players Championship.

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->…………….means the annual financial statements and other statements prescribed under Rule 65 of Kerala Panchayat Raj (Accounts) Rules, 2011?....

QA->Who has won the World Junior girls chess championship at Puerto Madryn in Argentina on November 3, 2009?....

QA->The statements “Protoplasm is the physical basis of life” is given by which person?....

QA->Who became the senior national champion by winning the 50th National Premier Chess Championship held in Kolkata?....

QA->How long are professional Golf Tour players allotted per short?....

MCQ->Which of the statements given below are correct? A) Julio Granda won the 2017 World Senior Chess Championship. B) Tan Zhongyi won the 2017 World Junior Chess Championship. C) Russia hosted the Golf 2017 Players Championship.....

MCQ->Which of the statements given below are correct? A) Julio Granda won the 2017 World Senior Chess Championship. B) Zhansaya Abdumalik won the Women's 2017 World Junior Chess Championship. C) In 2017 Pro Kabaddi League, Suraj Desai played for Dabang Delhi.....

MCQ->Which of the statements given below are correct? A) Julio Granda won the Chess 2017 Women's World Chess Championship. B) Australia hosted the Tennis 2017 Hopman Cup. C) Max Verstappen won the Formula One 2017 Malaysian Grand Prix.....

MCQ-> In a single elimination tournament, any a player is eliminated with a single loss. The tournament is played in multiple rounds subject to the following rules :(a) If the number of players, say n, in any round is even, then the players are grouped into n/2 pairs. The players in each pair play a match against each other and the winner moves on to the next round.(b) If the number of players, say n, in any round is odd, then one of them is given a bye, that is he automatically moves on to the next round. The remaining (n–1) players are grouped into (n–1)/2 pairs. The players in each pair play a match against each other and the winner moves on to the next round. No player gets more than one bye in the entire tournament.Thus, if n is even, then n/2 players move on to the next round while if n is odd, then (n+1)/2 players move on to the next round. The process is continued till the final round, which obviously is played between two players. The winner in the final round is the champion of the tournament.What is the number of Matches played by the champion?A. The entry list for the tournament consists of 83 players?B. The champion received one bye.
....

MCQ-> A game of strategy, as currently conceived in game theory, is a situation in which two or more “players” make choices among available alternatives (moves). The totality of choices determines the outcomes of the game, and it is assumed that the rank order of preferences for the outcomes is different for different players. Thus the “interests” of the players are generally in conflict. Whether these interests are diametrically opposed or only partially opposed depends on the type of game.Psychologically, most interesting situations arise when the interests of the players are partly coincident and partly opposed, because then one can postulate not only a conflict among the players but also inner conflicts within the players. Each is torn between a tendency to cooperate, so as to promote the common interests, and a tendency to compete, so as to enhance his own individual interests.Internal conflicts are always psychologically interesting. What we vaguely call “interesting” psychology is in very great measure the psychology of inner conflict. Inner conflict is also held to be an important component of serious literature as distinguished from less serious genres. The classical tragedy, as well as the serious novel, reveals the inner conflict of central figures. The superficial adventure story, on the other hand, depicts only external conflict; that is, the threats to the person with whom the reader (or viewer) identifies stem in these stories exclusively from external obstacles and from the adversaries who create them. On the most primitive level this sort of external conflict is psychologically empty. In the fisticuffs between the protagonists of good and evil, no psychological problems are involved or, at any rate, none are depicted in juvenile representations of conflict.The detective story, the “adult” analogue of a juvenile adventure tale, has at times been described as a glorification of intellectualized conflict. However, a great deal of the interest in the plots of these stories is sustained by withholding the unraveling of a solution to a problem. The effort of solving the problem is in itself not a conflict if the adversary (the unknown criminal) remains passive, like Nature, whose secrets the scientist supposedly unravels by deduction. If the adversary actively puts obstacles in the detective’s path toward the solution, there is genuine conflict. But the conflict is psychologically interesting only to the extent that it contains irrational components such as a tactical error on the criminal’s part or the detective’s insight into some psychological quirk of the criminal or something of this sort. Conflict conducted in a perfectly rational manner is psychologically no more interesting than a standard Western. For example, Tic-tac-toe, played perfectly by both players, is completely devoid of psychological interest. Chess may be psychologically interesting but only to the extent that it is played not quite rationally. Played completely rationally, chess would not be different from Tic-tac-toe.In short, a pure conflict of interest (what is called a zero-sum game) although it offers a wealth of interesting conceptual problems, is not interesting psychologically, except to the extent that its conduct departs from rational norms.According to the passage, internal conflicts are psychologically more interesting than external conflicts because
....