Toggle navigation
Home
Article Category
Question Papers
General Knowlege
Popular Pages
Multiple Choice Question in
Multiple Choice Question in 049
Multiple Choice Question in -current-affairs-2016
Multiple Choice Question in 2016
Multiple Choice Question in TRADES-INSTRUCTOR---GR-II---SMITHY---TECHNICAL-EDUCATION
Question Answer in ASSISTANT-PROFESSOR---COMPUTER-SCIENCE-AND-ENGINEERING---TECHNICAL-EDUCATION
Multiple Choice Question in ASSISTANT-PROFESSOR---COMPUTER-SCIENCE-AND-ENGINEERING---TECHNICAL-EDUCATION
Multiple Choice Question in english
Multiple Choice Question in abbreviations-abbreviations-m
Multiple Choice Question in 072/2016
Multiple Choice Question in SSC CHSL 7 March 2018 Morning Shift
Question Answer Bank
Multiple Choice Question Bank
Question Answer Category
Multiple Choice Question Category
Home
->
Multiple Choice Questions
1. Not a word was spoken by the criminal in self defence.
(A): The criminal spoke not a word in self defence.
(B): The criminal in self defence spoke no word.
(C): The criminal did not speak a word in self defence.
(D): The criminal spoke in self defence not a word.
Previous Question
Show Answer
Next Question
Add Tags
Report Error
Show Marks
Write Comment
Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)
Post reply
Comments
Tags
SSC CGL 2010 Tier 1 - Shift 1
Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->Which Five Year Plan’s aim was to make India’Self Reliant’and ‘self Generating’Economy?....
QA->One word Substitution of " Send back a criminal into custody for further investigation....
QA->The language ‘Dogri’ is spoken in:....
QA->The most spoken language in the world is?....
QA->The language which is spoken by the largest number of people in the world?....
MCQ->Not a word was spoken by the criminal in self defence.....
MCQ-> Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below : Eight persons- P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W - are sitting around a square table in such Question : way that four of them sit at four corners of the square while other four sit in the middle of each of the four sides. P, Q, R and S are facing towards the centre of table while T, U, V and W are facing outside. The ones who sit at the four corners face towards the centre while those who sit in the middle of the sides face outside. Each one of them has different legislative post viz, Defence Secretary, Finance Minister, Home Minister, Foreign Minister, HRD Minister, Education Minister, Prime Minister and Leader of Opposition but not necessarily in the same order. W is the second to the right of the Leader of Opposition. The Leader of Opposition is facing outside. T is the third to the left of Finance Minister. Finance Minister is not the immediate neighbour of W or Defence Secretary. R is not the Prime Minister and he is not the immediate neighbour of HRD Minister. U is to the immediate left of Prime Minister. Prime Minister is not the immediate neighbour of Defence Secretary. Home Minister and Foreign Minister are immediate neighbours of each other. Foreign Minister is not the immediate neighbour of the Leader of Opposition. There is only one person between Home Minister and S. V is Education Minister and he is not the immediate neighbour of P. S is not the Prime Minister.Who among the following is the Prime Minister ?
....
MCQ-> A game of strategy, as currently conceived in game theory, is a situation in which two or more “players” make choices among available alternatives (moves). The totality of choices determines the outcomes of the game, and it is assumed that the rank order of preferences for the outcomes is different for different players. Thus the “interests” of the players are generally in conflict. Whether these interests are diametrically opposed or only partially opposed depends on the type of game.Psychologically, most interesting situations arise when the interests of the players are partly coincident and partly opposed, because then one can postulate not only a conflict among the players but also inner conflicts within the players. Each is torn between a tendency to cooperate, so as to promote the common interests, and a tendency to compete, so as to enhance his own individual interests.Internal conflicts are always psychologically interesting. What we vaguely call “interesting” psychology is in very great measure the psychology of inner conflict. Inner conflict is also held to be an important component of serious literature as distinguished from less serious genres. The classical tragedy, as well as the serious novel, reveals the inner conflict of central figures. The superficial adventure story, on the other hand, depicts only external conflict; that is, the threats to the person with whom the reader (or viewer) identifies stem in these stories exclusively from external obstacles and from the adversaries who create them. On the most primitive level this sort of external conflict is psychologically empty. In the fisticuffs between the protagonists of good and evil, no psychological problems are involved or, at any rate, none are depicted in juvenile representations of conflict.The detective story, the “adult” analogue of a juvenile adventure tale, has at times been described as a glorification of intellectualized conflict. However, a great deal of the interest in the plots of these stories is sustained by withholding the unraveling of a solution to a problem. The effort of solving the problem is in itself not a conflict if the adversary (the unknown criminal) remains passive, like Nature, whose secrets the scientist supposedly unravels by deduction. If the adversary actively puts obstacles in the detective’s path toward the solution, there is genuine conflict. But the conflict is psychologically interesting only to the extent that it contains irrational components such as a tactical error on the criminal’s part or the detective’s insight into some psychological quirk of the criminal or something of this sort. Conflict conducted in a perfectly rational manner is psychologically no more interesting than a standard Western. For example, Tic-tac-toe, played perfectly by both players, is completely devoid of psychological interest. Chess may be psychologically interesting but only to the extent that it is played not quite rationally. Played completely rationally, chess would not be different from Tic-tac-toe.In short, a pure conflict of interest (what is called a zero-sum game) although it offers a wealth of interesting conceptual problems, is not interesting psychologically, except to the extent that its conduct departs from rational norms.According to the passage, internal conflicts are psychologically more interesting than external conflicts because
....
MCQ->Consider the following statements regarding Indian, Israeli defence co-operation: 1. Indian and Israeli firms will come together for a unique business seminar on defence and security in Israel. 2. Almost 25 Indian and 100 Israeli firms will participate in the seminar. 3. The seminar will be organised jointly by SIBAT, the Israeli defence ministry, the International Defence Cooperation Directorate and FICCI. It will take place from 21st-25th February 2016. Which of the above statement/s is/are correct?....
MCQ->Which of the following statements is ‘’true’’ about the opening of the defence production for private sector ? A. Now the defence production is open for 100% private participation B. Government has also allowed 26% direct foreign investment C. British defence industry has already purchase 20% stake in three defence production units....
×
×
Type The Issue
×
Your Marks
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use
Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...
Privacy
|
Terms And Conditions