Identify the wrong statement regarding the Miller capacitance of a CE amplifier : ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Identify the wrong statement regarding the Miller capacitance of a CE amplifier :

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Who became the first bowler to take 300 wickets in T20 matches when he dismissed David Miller of Kings XI Punjab in the IPL match held in Mohali?....

QA->WHAT IS THE UNIT OF CAPACITANCE....

QA->Which article of the Constitution of India is related to the protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech?....

QA->The provisions regarding trade and commerce in India has been copied from:....

QA->Who decided dispute regarding the election of President and Vice President?....

MCQ->For any inverting amplifier, the impedance capacitance will be ________ by a Miller effect capacitance sensitive to the gain of the amplifier and the interelectrode capacitance.....

MCQ->Identify the wrong statement regarding the Miller capacitance of a CE amplifier :....

MCQ->The following statements are true with respect to "Cascode Amplifier". The reduction in h12 and Miller capacitance result in negligible reverse internal feedback. A's is large loads cannot be connected. As a narrow band amplifier, it provides small range of cμ is reduced. As a narrow band amplifier it provides small range of frequencies parameters the effect of cμ reduces.....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow: Each piece, or part, of the whole of nature is always merely an approximation to the complete truth, or the complete truth so far as we know it. In fact, everything we know is only some kind of approximation, because we know that we do not know all the laws as yet. Therefore, things must be learned only to be unlearned again or, more likely, to be corrected. The principal of science, the definition, almost, is the following: The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific “truth.” But what is the source of knowledge? Where do the laws that are to be tested come from? Experiment, itself, helps to produce these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these hints the great generalizations – to guess at the wonderful, simple, but very strange patterns beneath them all, and then to experiment to check again whether we have made the right guess. This imagining process is so difficult that there is a division of labour in physics: there are theoretical physicists who imagine, deduce, and guess at new laws, but do not experiment; and then there are experimental physicists who experiment, imagine, deduce, and guess. We said that the laws of nature are approximate: that we first find the “wrong” ones, and then we find the “right” ones. Now, how can an experiment be “wrong”? First, in a trivial way: the apparatus can be faulty and you did not notice. But these things are easily fixed and checked back and forth. So without snatching at such minor things, how can the results of an experiment be wrong? Only by being inaccurate. For example, the mass of an object never seems to change; a spinning top has the same weight as a still one. So a “law” was invented: mass is constant, independent of speed. That “law” is now found to be incorrect. Mass is found is to increase with velocity, but appreciable increase requires velocities near that of light. A true law is: if an object moves with a speed of less than one hundred miles a second the mass is constant to within one part in a million. In some such approximate form this is a correct law. So in practice one might think that the new law makes no significant difference. Well, yes and no. For ordinary speeds we can certainly forget it and use the simple constant mass law as a good approximation. But for high speeds we are wrong, and the higher the speed, the wrong we are. Finally, and most interesting, philosophically we are completely wrong with the approximate law. Our entire picture of the world has to be altered even though the mass changes only by a little bit. This is a very peculiar thing about the philosophy, or the ideas, behind the laws. Even a very small effect sometimes requires profound changes to our ideas.Which of the following options is DEFINITLY NOT an approximation to the complete truth?
....

MCQ->Assertion (A): As per Miller theorem a capacitance C from input to output appears as a much larger capacitance across input terminalsReason (R): In a lag network the output voltage appears across capacitor

....