Plural of Daughter-in-law ? ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Plural of Daughter-in-law ?

Answer: Daughters-in-law

Reply

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Syngular or Plural of word Daughter-in-law....

QA->While introducing a girl in a party, Ramesh said, “She is the daughter-in-law of the only son of my father”. How is Ramesh related to the girl?....

QA->Pointing to a lady, a girl said “ she is the only one daughter- in-law of the grandmother of my father’s son”. How is that lady related to the girl?....

QA->Plural of Step-daughter ?....

MCQ->The sum of the ages of 4 members of a family 5 years ago was 94 years. Today, when the daughter has been married off and replaced by a daughter-in-law the sum of their ages is 92. Assuming that there has been no other change in the family structure and all the people are alive, what is the different in the age of the daughter and the daughter-in-law?...

MCQ->How is 'X' related to 'R' ? I. The brother of 'X' is married to 'D'. The father-in-law of D is the grandfather of R. R is the only daughter of D. X is brother-in-law of D. II. R is the only daughter of P. D is the daughter-in-law of M. P and X are two sons of M. X is not married to D....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow: Each piece, or part, of the whole of nature is always merely an approximation to the complete truth, or the complete truth so far as we know it. In fact, everything we know is only some kind of approximation, because we know that we do not know all the laws as yet. Therefore, things must be learned only to be unlearned again or, more likely, to be corrected. The principal of science, the definition, almost, is the following: The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific “truth.” But what is the source of knowledge? Where do the laws that are to be tested come from? Experiment, itself, helps to produce these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these laws, in the sense that it gives us hints. But also needed is imagination to create from these hints the great generalizations – to guess at the wonderful, simple, but very strange patterns beneath them all, and then to experiment to check again whether we have made the right guess. This imagining process is so difficult that there is a division of labour in physics: there are theoretical physicists who imagine, deduce, and guess at new laws, but do not experiment; and then there are experimental physicists who experiment, imagine, deduce, and guess. We said that the laws of nature are approximate: that we first find the “wrong” ones, and then we find the “right” ones. Now, how can an experiment be “wrong”? First, in a trivial way: the apparatus can be faulty and you did not notice. But these things are easily fixed and checked back and forth. So without snatching at such minor things, how can the results of an experiment be wrong? Only by being inaccurate. For example, the mass of an object never seems to change; a spinning top has the same weight as a still one. So a “law” was invented: mass is constant, independent of speed. That “law” is now found to be incorrect. Mass is found is to increase with velocity, but appreciable increase requires velocities near that of light. A true law is: if an object moves with a speed of less than one hundred miles a second the mass is constant to within one part in a million. In some such approximate form this is a correct law. So in practice one might think that the new law makes no significant difference. Well, yes and no. For ordinary speeds we can certainly forget it and use the simple constant mass law as a good approximation. But for high speeds we are wrong, and the higher the speed, the wrong we are. Finally, and most interesting, philosophically we are completely wrong with the approximate law. Our entire picture of the world has to be altered even though the mass changes only by a little bit. This is a very peculiar thing about the philosophy, or the ideas, behind the laws. Even a very small effect sometimes requires profound changes to our ideas.Which of the following options is DEFINITLY NOT an approximation to the complete truth?
...

MCQ->Introducing a boy, my mother told her daughter-in-law, "This is my brother's daughter's brother." Then what is my mother's daughter-in-law's relationship with that boy?...

MCQ->Match the singular in Column A with the relevant plural in Column B : A B a) Aquarium 1. Daughters-in-law b) Focus 2. Crises c) Crisis 3. Aquaria d) Daughter-in-law 4. Foci...