A negative feedback system has . The closed loop system is stable for ?->(Show Answer!)

1. A negative feedback system has . The closed loop system is stable for

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->WhichIndian bank has launched India’s first open loop EMV contactless metro card“Kochi 1”?....

QA->Which Telecom company buy Loop Mobile?....

QA->A currency the exchange value of which is expected to remain stable due to strong performance by it in an economy is called?....

QA->Uranium eventually decays into a stable isotope of element?....

QA->This firm was born out of Arthur Andersen , when it got closed down after the Enron scam, & had become an challenger to the Big 4 in India. Now it has dissolve itself & merged one part with Deloitte and the other with KPMG. Name it.....

MCQ->Which of the following sentences are correct about a for loop in a C program? 1: for loop works faster than a while loop. 2: All things that can be done using a for loop can also be done using a while loop. 3: for(;;); implements an infinite loop. 4: for loop can be used if we want statements in a loop get executed at least once.....

MCQ->A negative-feedback closed-loop system is supplied to an input 5 V. The system has a forward gain of 1 and a feedback gain of 1 and a feedback gain of 1. What is the output voltage?....

MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the follow. Popper claimed, scientific beliefs are universal in character, and have to be so if they are to serve us in explanation and prediction. For the universality of a scientific belief implies that, no matter how many instances we have found positive, there will always be an indefinite number of unexamined instances which may or may not also be positive. We have no good reason for supposing that any of these unexamined instances will be positive, or will be negative, so we must refrain from drawing any conclusions. On the other hand, a single negative instance is sufficient to prove that the belief is false, for such an instance is logically incompatible with the universal truth of the belief. Provided, therefore, that the instance is accepted as negative we must conclude that the scientific belief is false. In short, we can sometimes deduce that a universal scientific belief is false but we can never induce that a universal scientific belief is true. It is sometimes argued that this 'asymmetry' between verification and falsification is not nearly as pronounced as Popper declared it to be. Thus, there is no inconsistency in holding that a universal scientific belief is false despite any number of positive instances; and there is no inconsistency either in holding that a universal scientific belief is true despite the evidence of a negative instance. For the belief that an instance is negative is itself a scientific belief and may be falsified by experimental evidence which we accept and which is inconsistent with it. When, for example, we draw a right-angled triangle on the surface of a sphere using parts of three great circles for its sides, and discover that for this triangle Pythagoras' Theorem does not hold, we may decide that this apparently negative instance is not really negative because it is not a genuine instance at all. Triangles drawn on the surfaces of spheres are not the sort of triangles which fall within the scope of Pythagoras' Theorem. Falsification, that is to say, is no more capable of yielding conclusive rejections of scientific belief than verification is of yielding conclusive acceptances of scientific beliefs. The asymmetry between falsification and verification, therefore, has less logical significance than Popper supposed. We should, though, resist this reasoning. Falsifications may not be conclusive, for the acceptances on which rejections are based are always provisional acceptances. But, nevertheless, it remains the case that, in falsification, if we accept falsifying claims then, to remain consistent, we must reject falsified claims. On the other hand, although verifications are also not conclusive, our acceptance or rejection of verifying instances has no implications concerning the acceptance or rejection of verified claims. Falsifying claims sometimes give us a good reason for rejecting a scientific belief, namely when the claims are accepted. But verifying claims, even when accepted, give us no good and appropriate reason for accepting any scientific belief, because any such reason would have to be inductive to be appropriate and there are no good inductive reasons.According to Popper, the statement "Scientific beliefs are universal in character" implies that....

MCQ->The Nyquist plot of a stable, transfer function G(s) is shown in the figure. We are interested in the stability of the closed loop system in the feedback configuration shown.The gain and phase margins of G(s) for closed loop stability are....

MCQ->An amplifier has input impedance of 4 kΩ and output impedance of 80 kΩ. It is used in negative feedback circuit with 10% feedback. If open loop gain is 90, the closed loop input and output impedances are....