Which of the following is true concerning a procedure? ?->(Show Answer!)

1. Which of the following is true concerning a procedure?

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Theworld’s first baby was born from a new procedure that combines the DNA of threepeople. What is the name of the procedure?....

QA->Of the following, which procedure needs be carried out only at the end of every financial year in Grama Panchayats?....

QA->International Day for the Right to the Truth concerning Gross Human Rights Violations and for the Dignity of Victims....

QA->United States Secretary of Defense who resigned on November 24, 2014following conflicts within the administration, particularly relating to issues concerning ISIS/ISIL?....

QA->Who developed the theory of universe through his book "Six Books concerning the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres" ?....

MCQ-> Read the following discussion/passage and provide an appropriate answer for the questions that follow. Of the several features of the Toyota Production System that have been widely studied, most important is the mode of governance of the shop - floor at Toyota. Work and inter - relations between workers are highly scripted in extremely detailed ‘operating procedures’ that have to be followed rigidly, without any deviation at Toyota. Despite such rule - bound rigidity, however, Toyota does not become a ‘command - control system’. It is able to retain the character of a learning organizationIn fact, many observers characterize it as a community of scientists carrying out several small experiments simultaneously. The design of the operating procedure is the key. Every principal must find an expression in the operating procedure – that is how it has an effect in the domain of action. Workers on the shop - floor, often in teams, design the ‘operating procedure’ jointly with the supervisor through a series of hypothesis that are proposed and validated or refuted through experiments in action. The rigid and detailed ‘operating procedure’ specification throws up problems of the very minute kind; while its resolution leads to a reframing of the procedure and specifications. This inter - temporal change (or flexibility) of the specification (or operating procedure) is done at the lowest level of the organization; i.e. closest to the site of action. One implication of this arrangement is that system design can no longer be rationally optimal and standardized across the organization. It is quite common to find different work norms in contiguous assembly lines, because each might have faced a different set of problems and devised different counter - measures to tackle it. Design of the coordinating process that essentially imposes the discipline that is required in large - scale complex manufacturing systems is therefore customized to variations in man - machine context of the site of action. It evolves through numerous points of negotiation throughout the organization. It implies then that the higher levels of the hierarchy do not exercise the power of the fiat in setting work rules, for such work rules are no longer a standard set across the whole organization. It might be interesting to go through the basic Toyota philosophy that underlines its system designing practices. The notion of the ideal production system in Toyota embraces the following -‘the ability to deliver just - in - time (or on demand) a customer order in the exact specification demanded, in a batch size of one (and hence an infinite proliferation of variants, models and specifications), defect - free, without wastage of material, labour, energy or motion in a safe and (physically and emotionally) fulfilling production environment’. It did not embrace the concept of a standardized product that can be cheap by giving up variations. Preserving consumption variety was seen, in fact, as one mode of serving society. It is interesting to note that the articulation of the Toyota philosophy was made around roughly the same time that the Fordist system was establishing itself in the US automotive industry. What can be best defended as the asset which Toyota model of production leverages to give the vast range of models in a defect - free fashion?
....

MCQ->Which two statements are true about wrapper or String classes? If x and y refer to instances of different wrapper classes, then the fragment x.equals(y) will cause a compiler failure. If x and y refer to instances of different wrapper classes, then x == y can sometimes be true. If x and y are String references and if x.equals(y) is true, then x == y is true. If x, y, and z refer to instances of wrapper classes and x.equals(y) is true, and y.equals(z) is true, then z.equals(x) will always be true. If x and y are String references and x == y is true, then y.equals(x) will be true.....

MCQ->Which two statements are true about comparing two instances of the same class, given that the equals() and hashCode() methods have been properly overridden? If the equals() method returns true, the hashCode() comparison == must return true. If the equals() method returns false, the hashCode() comparison != must return true. If the hashCode() comparison == returns true, the equals() method must return true. If the hashCode() comparison == returns true, the equals() method might return true.....

MCQ-> In the following questions, the symbols §, *, $, @ and © are used with the following meaning as illustrated below: ‘P $ Q’ means ‘P is neither smaller than nor greater than Q`. ‘P § Q’ means ‘P is not smaller than Q’. ‘P © Q’ means ‘P is either smaller than or equal to Q’. ‘P * Q’ means ‘P is smaller than Q’. ‘P @ Q’ means is neither smaller than nor equal to Q’. Now in each of the following questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below them is/ are definitely true ? Give answer: a: if only Conclusion I is true. b: if only Conclusion II is true. c: if either Conclusion I or II is true. d: if neither Conclusion I nor II is true, e: if both Conclusions I and II are true.Statements : W $ F, F § R, R * M Conclusions : I. R * W II, R $ W....

MCQ-> In the following questions, the symbols @, ©. $, % and * are used with the following meaning as illustrated below ‘P ©Q’ means ‘P is not greater than Q.. ‘P % Q’ means ‘P is not smaller than Q’. ‘P * Q’ means ‘P is neither smaller than nor equal to Q’. ‘P @ Q’ means P is neither greater than nor equal to Q’. ‘P $ Q’ means ‘P is neither greater than nor smaller than Q’. Now in each of the following questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below them is/ are definitely true ? a: if only Conclusion 1 is true. b: if only Conclusion II is true. c: if either Conclusion I or II is true. d: if neither Conclusion I nor II is true. e: if both Conclusions I and li are true.Statements : K @ V. V © N, N % F Conclusions: I. F @ V II. K @ N....