1. The treatment that follows printing are termed





Write Comment

Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)

Comments

Tags
Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->WhichUniversity researchers have found a new Bio-Ink for 3D printing using stemcells that allows printing of living tissue called as Bio-Printing?....
QA->According to a news report RBI has stopped printing 2000 Rs note. Instead it is printing notes of a lower denomination. What is its value ?....
QA->Which medical system follows the maxim "Like cures like" ?....
QA->The Indian Constitution closely follows the constitutional system of ?....
QA->Any man who follows a woman and contacts repeatedly despite a clear indication of disinterest by such woman is punishable under Section 354D of the Indian Penal Code for the offence of :....
MCQ-> The passage below is accompanied by a set of six questions. Choose the best answer to each question.I used a smartphone GPS to find my way through the cobblestoned maze of Geneva's Old Town, in search of a handmade machine that changed the world more than any other invention. Near a 13th-century cathedral in this Swiss city on the shores of a lovely lake, I found what I was looking for: a Gutenberg printing press. "This was the Internet of its day — at least as influential as the iPhone," said Gabriel de Montmollin, the director of the Museum of the Reformation, toying with the replica of Johann Gutenberg's great invention.Before the invention of the printing press, it used to take four monks up to a year to produce a single book. With the advance in movable type in 15th-century Europe, one press could crank out 3,000 pages a day. Before long, average people could travel to places that used to be unknown to them — with maps! Medical information passed more freely and quickly, diminishing the sway of quacks. The printing press offered the prospect that tyrants would never be able to kill a book or suppress an idea. Gutenberg's brainchild broke the monopoly that clerics had on scripture. And later, stirred by pamphlets from a version of that same press, the American colonies rose up against a king and gave birth to a nation.So, a question in the summer of this 10th anniversary of the iPhone: has the device that is perhaps the most revolutionary of all time given us a single magnificent idea? Nearly every advancement of the written word through new technology has also advanced humankind. Sure , you can say the iPhone changed everything. By putting the world's recorded knowledge in the palm of a hand, it revolutionized work, dining, travel and socializing. It made us more narcissistic — here's more of me doing cool stuff! — and it unleashed an army of awful trolls. We no longer have the patience to sit through a baseball game without that reach to the pocket. And one more casualty of Apple selling more than a billion phones in a decade's time: daydreaming has become a lost art.For all of that, I'm still waiting to see if the iPhone can do what the printing press did for religion and democracy...the Geneva museum makes a strong case that the printing press opened more minds than anything else...it's hard to imagine the French or American revolutions without those enlightened voices in print...Not long after Steve Jobs introduced his iPhone, he said the bound book was probably headed for history's attic. Not so fast. After a period of rapid growth in e-books, something closer to the medium for Chaucer's volumes has made a great comeback.The hope of the iPhone, and the Internet in general, was that it would free people in closed societies. But the failure of the Arab Spring, and the continued suppression of ideas in North Korea, China and Iran, has not borne that out. The iPhone is still young. It has certainly been "one of the most important, world-changing and successful products in. history," as Apple C.E.O. Tim Cook said. But I'm not sure if the world changed for the better with the iPhone — as it did with the printing press — or merely changed.The printing press has been likened to the Internet for which one of the following reasons?
 ....
MCQ->Consider the following statements in regard to aerobic and anaerobic treatment processes :1. Biomass production in the aerobic treatment process is more as compared to the anaerobic treatment process.2. Start-up period is more in the aerobic treatment process as compared to the anaerobic treatment process.3. Energy consumption and production is more in the aerobic treatment process as compared to the anaerobic treatment process.Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?....
MCQ-> In each of the questions/set of questions below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the two given conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statement. a: if only conclusion I follows. b: if only conclusion II follows. c: if either conclusion I or conclusion II follows. d: it neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows. e: if both conclusions I and 11 follow.Statements All alphabets are numbers. Some alphabets are digits. Conclusions I. At least some digits are numbers. II. No digit is a number.....
MCQ-> In each question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have,to take the given statement’ to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly know facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer a: if only conclusion I follows. Give answer b: if only conclusion II follows. Give, answer c: if either conclusion I or conclusion follows. Give answer d: if neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows. Give answer e: if both conclusion I and conclusion II follow.Statements No colour is a paint. No colour is a varnish. Conclusions I. No varnish is a paint. II. At least some varnishes are paints.....
MCQ-> In each of the questions below, two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding the commonly known facts. Give answer a: if only conclusion I follows. Give answer b: if only conclusion II follows. Give answer c: if either conclusion I or II follows. Give answer d: if neither conclusion I nor II follows. Give answer e: if both conclusions I and II follow.Statements : All stones are pebbles. All pebbles are rocks. Conclusions I. All stones are rocks. II. All rocks are pebbles.....
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use
DMCA.com Protection Status Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions