On My Terms is an autobiography of.. ?->(Show Answer!)

1. On My Terms is an autobiography of..

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->WhichDictionary added 19 Singaporean terms and 13 Hong Kong terms and also includesabout 500 new words and phrases from around the world?....

QA->Name theSachin Tendulkar"s autobiography which won the Crossword Book of the Year Awardin the autobiography category?....

QA->A crocodile had just eaten a lamb when a hawk saw the crocodile, attacked it and consumed it. The hawk is in ecological terms:....

QA->Computer processing speed is measured in terms....

QA->In the first half of 2017, a new group has become the world’s no 1 car producer in terms of volume. Name it.....

MCQ->The Fourier series of a real periodic function has only Cosine terms if it is evenSine terms if it is evenCosine terms if it is oddSine terms if it is odd Which of the above statements are correct?....

MCQ->Read the following statements about time and space requirements of microprocessors Space requirement is also known as memory requirement.Space requirement is expressed in terms of bytes.Time requirement is expressed in terms of states.Time requirement is expressed in terms of μ- s. Which of the above statements are correct?....

MCQ->If the sum of the first 11 terms of an arithmetic progression equals that of the first 19 terms, then what is the sum of the first 30 terms?....

MCQ->India is not on the coverage frontier becauseA. it is lower than Bangladesh in terms of coverage of drinking water facilities.B. it is lower than Sri Lanka in terms of coverage of sanitation facilities.C. it is lower than Pakistan in terms of coverage of sanitation facilities.D. it is dominated by Indonesia.....

MCQ-> Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questionsThere is an essential and irreducible ‘duality’ in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her ‘agency’, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her ‘well-being’. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self- interested motivation, in which a person’s agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person’s agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one’s agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting. To recognize the distinction between the ‘agency aspect’ and the ‘well-being aspect’ of a person does not require us to take the view that the person’s success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person’s well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation. The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility - based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well- being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.According to the ideas in the passage, the following are not true expect:
....