The RBI is not concerned with ?->(Show Answer!)

1. The RBI is not concerned with

Write Comment

Comments

Tags

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->Whichcompany becomes first firm to get RBI approval for debt recast under RBI"s newScheme for Sustainable Structuring of Stressed Assets (S4A)?....

QA->Whichcompany becomes first firm to get RBI approval for debt recast under RBI"s newScheme for Sustainable Structuring of StressedAssets (S4A)?....

QA->One not concerned with right or wrong....

QA->Preposition adding to " concerned (adj) "....

QA->In which file the concerned clerk add the current, if it is related to an unclosed case:....

MCQ->Which of the below statement/s is/are correct regarding RBI's first bi-monthly policy for the year 2016-17: 1. The RBI has cut key interest rates by 25 basis points. The CRR has remained unchanged at 23%. 3. The rate at which RBI lends to the financial system has come down to 6.5 percent. 4. The rate at which banks can keep excess funds with the RBI was hiked to 6 percent.....

MCQ->The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) acts as a bankers' bank. This would imply which of the following? 1. Other banks retain their deposits with the RBI. 2. The RBI lends funds to the commercial banks in times of need. 3. The RBI advises the commercial banks on monetary matters. Select the correct answer using the codes given below :....

MCQ->Which of the following projections is/are made by the RBI in its Monetary and Credit policy of the RBI for 2009-10 ? (A) It has projected that the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) based in ation would be around 4% by. March 2010 (B)The RBI has decided that it would continue to use the completion of monetary arid debt management tools to ensure successful completion of Govt. borrowing plans. (C) As per RBI projections deposits of scheduled commercial. banks would grow to about 18%.....

MCQ->Pick out thể one word for - a secret arrangement....

MCQ-> Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questionsThere is an essential and irreducible ‘duality’ in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her ‘agency’, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her ‘well-being’. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self- interested motivation, in which a person’s agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person’s agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one’s agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting. To recognize the distinction between the ‘agency aspect’ and the ‘well-being aspect’ of a person does not require us to take the view that the person’s success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person’s well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation. The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility - based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well- being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.According to the ideas in the passage, the following are not true expect:
....