1. Negative feedback added to an op-amp ________ the bandwidth and ________ the gain.





Write Comment

Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)

Comments

Tags
Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->The negative plate of a fully discharged lead acid battery contains:....
QA->WHICH IS THE MOST ELECTRO NEGATIVE ELEMENT....
QA->In which plan was the growth rate of agricultural production negative?....
QA->Which countries have achieved a negative growth rate of population?....
QA->A soap bubble is given negative charge then what happen in its radius?....
MCQ->Assertion (A): A large negative feedback is deliberately introduced in an amplifier to make its gain independent of variation is in parameters of active device and other components.Reason (R): A large negative feedback results in a high value of return difference compared to unity which makes the feedback gain inversely proportional to feedback factor.

....
MCQ->Assertion (A): A large negative feedback is deliberately introduced in an amplifier to make its gain independent of variation in parameters of active device.Reason (R): A large negative value of feedback results in a high value of return difference compared to unity which makes the feedback gain inversely proportional to the feedback factor.

....
MCQ-> Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the follow. Popper claimed, scientific beliefs are universal in character, and have to be so if they are to serve us in explanation and prediction. For the universality of a scientific belief implies that, no matter how many instances we have found positive, there will always be an indefinite number of unexamined instances which may or may not also be positive. We have no good reason for supposing that any of these unexamined instances will be positive, or will be negative, so we must refrain from drawing any conclusions. On the other hand, a single negative instance is sufficient to prove that the belief is false, for such an instance is logically incompatible with the universal truth of the belief. Provided, therefore, that the instance is accepted as negative we must conclude that the scientific belief is false. In short, we can sometimes deduce that a universal scientific belief is false but we can never induce that a universal scientific belief is true. It is sometimes argued that this 'asymmetry' between verification and falsification is not nearly as pronounced as Popper declared it to be. Thus, there is no inconsistency in holding that a universal scientific belief is false despite any number of positive instances; and there is no inconsistency either in holding that a universal scientific belief is true despite the evidence of a negative instance. For the belief that an instance is negative is itself a scientific belief and may be falsified by experimental evidence which we accept and which is inconsistent with it. When, for example, we draw a right-angled triangle on the surface of a sphere using parts of three great circles for its sides, and discover that for this triangle Pythagoras' Theorem does not hold, we may decide that this apparently negative instance is not really negative because it is not a genuine instance at all. Triangles drawn on the surfaces of spheres are not the sort of triangles which fall within the scope of Pythagoras' Theorem. Falsification, that is to say, is no more capable of yielding conclusive rejections of scientific belief than verification is of yielding conclusive acceptances of scientific beliefs. The asymmetry between falsification and verification, therefore, has less logical significance than Popper supposed. We should, though, resist this reasoning. Falsifications may not be conclusive, for the acceptances on which rejections are based are always provisional acceptances. But, nevertheless, it remains the case that, in falsification, if we accept falsifying claims then, to remain consistent, we must reject falsified claims. On the other hand, although verifications are also not conclusive, our acceptance or rejection of verifying instances has no implications concerning the acceptance or rejection of verified claims. Falsifying claims sometimes give us a good reason for rejecting a scientific belief, namely when the claims are accepted. But verifying claims, even when accepted, give us no good and appropriate reason for accepting any scientific belief, because any such reason would have to be inductive to be appropriate and there are no good inductive reasons.According to Popper, the statement "Scientific beliefs are universal in character" implies that....
MCQ->Consider the following statements, regarding an OP AMP: All types of negative feedback reduce non-linear distortion.All types of negative feedback reduce the output offset voltage.Non-inverting (current and voltage) feedback increases the input impedance.Inverting (current and voltage) feedback decreases input impedance. Which of the above statements is/are correct?....
MCQ->A negative-feedback closed-loop system is supplied to an input 5 V. The system has a forward gain of 1 and a feedback gain of 1 and a feedback gain of 1. What is the output voltage?....
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use
DMCA.com Protection Status Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions